MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4407408564 · doi:10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.44450

EXPLORING THE NEED FOR LOWER LIMB PROSTHETIC GUIDELINES IN SOUTH AFRICA'S PRIVATE HEALTHCARE SECTOR

2025· article· en· W4407408564 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Bennie Theron, Surona Visagie

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPrivate sectorHealth careBusinessLower limbNursingMedicineEconomic growthEconomicsSurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Evidence based guidelines can assist with prosthetic component selection and clinical intervention. There is limited evidence on lower limb prosthetic prescription guidelines in the South African private health care sector. OBJECTIVE: To explore the need for lower limb prosthetic prescription guidelines in the South African private healthcare sector. METHODOLOGY: Three main funders of lower limb prosthetics in the South African private healthcare sector (Road Accident Fund (RAF), Workmen’s Compensation Fund (WCA), and Council of Medical Schemes (CMS)) were explored using a case study design. Data were collected from six regulatory documents, sixteen purposively sampled prosthetic users, who received services from these funders, and seven key informants. Documents were assessed with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II), across six domains. Data from users and key informants were collected with telephonic, semi-structured interviews guided by interview schedules. Interview schedules were self-developed and tailored for each participant group. AGREE II data were analyzed descriptively. Inductive thematic analysis was used for interview data. FINDINGS: Across cases, the “Scope and Purpose” domain scored the highest: 50% (WCA), 47% (CMS), and 22% (RAF). “Editorial Independence” scored 0% for all three cases. Other challenging domains were “Applicability” (WCA: 17%, CMS: 6%, RAF: 6%) and “Rigour of Development” (WCA: 8%, CMS: 25%, RAF: 0%). The following three cross-case themes emerged from the interviews: “Guideline Availability and Necessity” showed that guidelines were seldom used and that guidelines could be beneficial; “Purpose of a Lower Limb Prosthetic Guideline” indicated that guidelines can support accessible, equitable, ethical, and transparent services; and “Guideline Development Requirements” explained that an evidence based collaborative process, facilitated by an independent body should underscore guideline development. CONCLUSION: Evidence based, standardized, transparent guidelines will be beneficial to direct prosthetic service delivery in the South African private healthcare sector. The guidelines must be applicable, rigorously developed, and show editorial independence. Layman's Abstract Guidelines that provide directions to funders and service providers can help with selection of suitable prosthetic components. There is little information on the use of guidelines in prosthetic service provision in South Africa's private healthcare sector. This study wanted to determine if there was a need to use guidelines for prescribing lower limb prosthetics in South Africa's private healthcare sector and whether guidelines were currently used in the sector. The Road Accident Fund, Workmen’s Compensation Fund, and Council of Medical Schemes were studied. Six documents that guided services at the three organizations were reviewed. In addition, sixteen prosthetic users who received services from the organizations and seven experts were interviewed. The results showed that the scope and purpose of the documents was partially defined. The documents were developed by the organizations and not reviewed by independent stakeholders such as service users. The methods used to develop the documents and the use of evidence during development were poorly described. The documents also do not describe how the guidelines provided can be put into practice, how much it will cost, what barriers to expect, and how these can be overcome. These documents cannot serve as guidelines in their current format. The interviewees felt that guidelines could be helpful to the industry as a way of enabling fair, accessible, and transparent prosthetic services. Guidelines should take current evidence into consideration. The development process that must be driven by an independent organization rather than government or the funders and involve all stakeholders. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/44450/33671 How To Cite: Theron B, Visagie S. Exploring the need for lower limb prosthetic guidelines in South Africa's private healthcare sector. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2024; Volume 7, Issue 2, No. 8. Https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.44450 Corresponding Author: Mr. Bennie Theron, CPO, MScAffiliation: University of Stellenbosch, Division of Disability and Rehabilitation Studies, South Africa.E-Mail: Benjetheron@live.comORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0487-9050

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,707
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,058
Tête enseignante GPT0,262
Écart entre enseignants0,204 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics JournalMême sujetProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsTravaux en français237 207