MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407408564 · doi:10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.44450

EXPLORING THE NEED FOR LOWER LIMB PROSTHETIC GUIDELINES IN SOUTH AFRICA'S PRIVATE HEALTHCARE SECTOR

2025· article· en· W4407408564 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Bennie Theron, Surona Visagie

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrivate sectorHealth careBusinessLower limbNursingMedicineEconomic growthEconomicsSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Evidence based guidelines can assist with prosthetic component selection and clinical intervention. There is limited evidence on lower limb prosthetic prescription guidelines in the South African private health care sector. OBJECTIVE: To explore the need for lower limb prosthetic prescription guidelines in the South African private healthcare sector. METHODOLOGY: Three main funders of lower limb prosthetics in the South African private healthcare sector (Road Accident Fund (RAF), Workmen’s Compensation Fund (WCA), and Council of Medical Schemes (CMS)) were explored using a case study design. Data were collected from six regulatory documents, sixteen purposively sampled prosthetic users, who received services from these funders, and seven key informants. Documents were assessed with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II), across six domains. Data from users and key informants were collected with telephonic, semi-structured interviews guided by interview schedules. Interview schedules were self-developed and tailored for each participant group. AGREE II data were analyzed descriptively. Inductive thematic analysis was used for interview data. FINDINGS: Across cases, the “Scope and Purpose” domain scored the highest: 50% (WCA), 47% (CMS), and 22% (RAF). “Editorial Independence” scored 0% for all three cases. Other challenging domains were “Applicability” (WCA: 17%, CMS: 6%, RAF: 6%) and “Rigour of Development” (WCA: 8%, CMS: 25%, RAF: 0%). The following three cross-case themes emerged from the interviews: “Guideline Availability and Necessity” showed that guidelines were seldom used and that guidelines could be beneficial; “Purpose of a Lower Limb Prosthetic Guideline” indicated that guidelines can support accessible, equitable, ethical, and transparent services; and “Guideline Development Requirements” explained that an evidence based collaborative process, facilitated by an independent body should underscore guideline development. CONCLUSION: Evidence based, standardized, transparent guidelines will be beneficial to direct prosthetic service delivery in the South African private healthcare sector. The guidelines must be applicable, rigorously developed, and show editorial independence. Layman's Abstract Guidelines that provide directions to funders and service providers can help with selection of suitable prosthetic components. There is little information on the use of guidelines in prosthetic service provision in South Africa's private healthcare sector. This study wanted to determine if there was a need to use guidelines for prescribing lower limb prosthetics in South Africa's private healthcare sector and whether guidelines were currently used in the sector. The Road Accident Fund, Workmen’s Compensation Fund, and Council of Medical Schemes were studied. Six documents that guided services at the three organizations were reviewed. In addition, sixteen prosthetic users who received services from the organizations and seven experts were interviewed. The results showed that the scope and purpose of the documents was partially defined. The documents were developed by the organizations and not reviewed by independent stakeholders such as service users. The methods used to develop the documents and the use of evidence during development were poorly described. The documents also do not describe how the guidelines provided can be put into practice, how much it will cost, what barriers to expect, and how these can be overcome. These documents cannot serve as guidelines in their current format. The interviewees felt that guidelines could be helpful to the industry as a way of enabling fair, accessible, and transparent prosthetic services. Guidelines should take current evidence into consideration. The development process that must be driven by an independent organization rather than government or the funders and involve all stakeholders. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/44450/33671 How To Cite: Theron B, Visagie S. Exploring the need for lower limb prosthetic guidelines in South Africa's private healthcare sector. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2024; Volume 7, Issue 2, No. 8. Https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.44450 Corresponding Author: Mr. Bennie Theron, CPO, MScAffiliation: University of Stellenbosch, Division of Disability and Rehabilitation Studies, South Africa.E-Mail: Benjetheron@live.comORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0487-9050

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics JournalSame topicProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsFrench-language works237,207