LUMATEPERONE TREATMENT FOR MAJOR DEPRESSIVE EPISODES WITH MIXED FEATURES IN MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER AND BIPOLAR I OR BIPOLAR II DISORDER
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background The DSM-5 and DSM-5-TR define mixed features in major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar depression (BPD) as having subsyndromal manic or hypomanic symptoms nearly every day during the majority of days of a major depressive episode (MDE). Mixed features are common in MDD and BPD (25%-35%) and patients with mixed features have more severe symptoms, more comorbidities, increased suicide risk, and poorer treatment response than patients without mixed features. Aims & Objectives Lumateperone is an FDA-approved antipsychotic to treat schizophrenia and depressive episodes associated with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial (NCT04285515) investigated the efficacy and safety of lumateperone 42mg for the treatment of an MDE in patients with MDD or BPD with mixed features. Method Eligible adults (18-75 years) had DSM-5 diagnosed MDD or bipolar I or II disorder with mixed features and were experiencing an MDE (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] Total score>=24, Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity [CGI-S] score>=4). Patients, stratified by MDD or BPD, were randomized 1:1 to 6-weeks treatment with lumateperone 42mg or placebo. The primary and key secondary efficacy endpoints were change from baseline to Day 43 in MADRS Total and CGI-S score, respectively, analyzed using a mixed- effects model for repeated measures. Three populations with mixed features were assessed: the overall combined MDD and BPD population, the individual MDD population, and the individual BPD population. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), laboratory parameters, vital signs, and extrapyramidal symptoms. Results In this study, 385 patients received treatment (placebo, n=193; lumateperone, n=192) and 344 (89.4%) completed the study. Patients with MDD or BPD and mixed features treated with lumateperone 42mg had significantly greater MADRS Total score improvement compared with placebo as indicated by mean change from baseline to Day 43 (placebo, n=191; lumateperone, n=192; least squares mean difference vs placebo [LSMD]=−5.7; 95% CI, −7.60, −3.84; effect size [ES]=−0.64; P<.0001). Improvements with lumateperone were also significant in individual patient populations with MDD with mixed features (placebo, n=92; lumateperone, n=92; LSMD=−5.9; 95%CI, −8.61, −3.29; ES=−0.67; P<.0001) or BPD with mixed features (placebo, n=99; lumateperone, n=100; LSMD=−5.7; 95%CI, −8.29, −3.05; ES=−0.64; P<.0001). Significant improvements compared with placebo were also observed for CGI-S, the key secondary endpoint, in the combined MDD and BPD population (LSMD=−0.6; 95%CI, −0.81, −0.39; ES=−0.59; P<.0001), individual MDD population (LSMD=− 0.6; 95%CI, −0.89, −0.27; ES=−0.57; P<.001), and individual BPD population (LSMD=−0.6; 95%CI, −0.91, −0.31; ES=−0.61; P<.0001). Lumateperone treatment was generally safe and well tolerated and consistent with prior studies. The most common treatment-emergent AEs with lumateperone (>=5% and twice placebo) were somnolence, dizziness, and nausea. No serious AEs were reported with lumateperone. Discussion & Conclusion Lumateperone 42mg demonstrated robust efficacy over placebo in patients with MDD or BPD with mixed features. Lumateperone was generally safe and well tolerated with no new safety concerns. These results suggest lumateperone 42mg is a promising new treatment for MDEs in MDD with mixed features or BPD with mixed features.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».