MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407418313 · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyae059.033

LUMATEPERONE TREATMENT FOR MAJOR DEPRESSIVE EPISODES WITH MIXED FEATURES IN MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER AND BIPOLAR I OR BIPOLAR II DISORDER

2025· article· en· W4407418313 on OpenAlexaff
Zubin Bhagwagar, Susan G Kozauer, Willie Earley, Changzheng Chen, Jason Huo, Stephen M. Stahl, Roger S. McIntyre, Suresh Durgam

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBipolar Disorder and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBipolar disorderMajor depressive disorderBipolar II disorderPsychiatryTreatment of bipolar disorderBipolar I disorderDepressive symptomsPsychologyMedicineManiaLithium (medication)MoodAnxiety

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The DSM-5 and DSM-5-TR define mixed features in major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar depression (BPD) as having subsyndromal manic or hypomanic symptoms nearly every day during the majority of days of a major depressive episode (MDE). Mixed features are common in MDD and BPD (25%-35%) and patients with mixed features have more severe symptoms, more comorbidities, increased suicide risk, and poorer treatment response than patients without mixed features. Aims & Objectives Lumateperone is an FDA-approved antipsychotic to treat schizophrenia and depressive episodes associated with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial (NCT04285515) investigated the efficacy and safety of lumateperone 42mg for the treatment of an MDE in patients with MDD or BPD with mixed features. Method Eligible adults (18-75 years) had DSM-5 diagnosed MDD or bipolar I or II disorder with mixed features and were experiencing an MDE (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] Total score>=24, Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity [CGI-S] score>=4). Patients, stratified by MDD or BPD, were randomized 1:1 to 6-weeks treatment with lumateperone 42mg or placebo. The primary and key secondary efficacy endpoints were change from baseline to Day 43 in MADRS Total and CGI-S score, respectively, analyzed using a mixed- effects model for repeated measures. Three populations with mixed features were assessed: the overall combined MDD and BPD population, the individual MDD population, and the individual BPD population. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), laboratory parameters, vital signs, and extrapyramidal symptoms. Results In this study, 385 patients received treatment (placebo, n=193; lumateperone, n=192) and 344 (89.4%) completed the study. Patients with MDD or BPD and mixed features treated with lumateperone 42mg had significantly greater MADRS Total score improvement compared with placebo as indicated by mean change from baseline to Day 43 (placebo, n=191; lumateperone, n=192; least squares mean difference vs placebo [LSMD]=−5.7; 95% CI, −7.60, −3.84; effect size [ES]=−0.64; P<.0001). Improvements with lumateperone were also significant in individual patient populations with MDD with mixed features (placebo, n=92; lumateperone, n=92; LSMD=−5.9; 95%CI, −8.61, −3.29; ES=−0.67; P<.0001) or BPD with mixed features (placebo, n=99; lumateperone, n=100; LSMD=−5.7; 95%CI, −8.29, −3.05; ES=−0.64; P<.0001). Significant improvements compared with placebo were also observed for CGI-S, the key secondary endpoint, in the combined MDD and BPD population (LSMD=−0.6; 95%CI, −0.81, −0.39; ES=−0.59; P<.0001), individual MDD population (LSMD=− 0.6; 95%CI, −0.89, −0.27; ES=−0.57; P<.001), and individual BPD population (LSMD=−0.6; 95%CI, −0.91, −0.31; ES=−0.61; P<.0001). Lumateperone treatment was generally safe and well tolerated and consistent with prior studies. The most common treatment-emergent AEs with lumateperone (>=5% and twice placebo) were somnolence, dizziness, and nausea. No serious AEs were reported with lumateperone. Discussion & Conclusion Lumateperone 42mg demonstrated robust efficacy over placebo in patients with MDD or BPD with mixed features. Lumateperone was generally safe and well tolerated with no new safety concerns. These results suggest lumateperone 42mg is a promising new treatment for MDEs in MDD with mixed features or BPD with mixed features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Journal of NeuropsychopharmacologySame topicBipolar Disorder and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207