Some Results of ERTF Carbon Capture Pilot Plant
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Emissions Reduction Test Facility (ERTF) Carbon Capture Pilot Plant located in Renfrew, UK, was built and commissioned in 2010, and it is based on Delta CleanTech first carbon capture generation technology, Thermal Kinetics Optimization® Configuration (TKO®). The ERTF pilot plant was designed to evaluate post-combustion CO 2 capture technologies and to accommodate several test campaigns such as solvent screening, process configuration evaluation, new unit operation evaluation, variety of flue gases inlet (coal, natural gas, and simulated flue gases), and different operating parameters. Furthermore, the ERTF pilot plant was designed in water balance, which means no demineralized water make-up is needed during normal steady-state operation and no water purge to waste water treatment. The pilot plant capacity is ranging from 0.5 to 1.0 metric tonne per day of CO 2 , depending on the flue gas type, solvent type, operating parameters, and process configuration. In this paper, the results from some test campaigns were reported, which represent the performance of the Delta first-generation technology known as Thermal Kinetics Optimization® Configuration (TKO®) and RS-2® solvent. Three test campaigns’ results were presented in this work. The first test run (run #107) was conducted successfully to capture 1 TPD using RS-2 ® solvent at a CO 2 recovery rate of 91.2%. The steam consumption of this test run was 1.33 kg steam per kilogram of CO 2 (low-pressure saturated steam at 140°C). At a flue gas rate of 230 kg/h and a solvent rate of 780 kg/h, it is not possible to achieve CO 2 rich loading of more than 0.38 mol/mol, which is not the optimum operating parameter to capture the CO 2 at 90% CO 2 recovery at minimum reboiler steam consumption of less than 1.2 kg/kg as a target. The second and third test runs (runs #108 and #109) were successfully conducted to capture more than 90% of CO 2 from the flue gas at a steam consumption of equal or less than 1.2 kg steam per kilogram of CO 2 . In this test campaign, the flue gas rate was 126 kg/h, and the solvent rate was 350 kg/h. At these optimum operating parameters, it is possible to achieve a steam consumption of less than 1.2 kg steam per kilogram of CO 2 by capturing about 0.6 TPD of CO 2 from coal flue gas. The ERTF pilot plant can be operated at a steady state for a reasonable time and can meet the low-energy demand of RS-2® solvent using the TKO® process configuration. Furthermore, a validation study of the ERTF operating results using a rate-based process simulator has been conducted. A good agreement between the predicted and measured data was obtained and reported for the three test campaign runs (#107, #108, and #109).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».