Finerenone and Outpatient Worsening Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Importance: Worsening heart failure (HF) is commonly managed in the outpatient setting with adjustments in oral diuretic therapy. The effect of the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone on outpatient worsening HF events in patients with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the effect of finerenone on outpatient worsening HF events requiring oral diuretic intensification among patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a secondary analysis of the Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF), a global, multicenter randomized clinical trial. Patients had HF and an ejection fraction of 40% or greater. Data analysis was conducted from September 1 to December 10, 2024. Intervention: Participants were randomized 1:1 to finerenone or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome events (cardiovascular death, HF hospitalization, and outpatient urgent HF visit requiring intravenous diuretic therapy) were centrally adjudicated. In this prespecified analysis, outpatient oral diuretic intensification events were defined as initiations of loop or thiazide diuretic or increases in loop diuretic dosage. The risk of all-cause death following each type of worsening HF event (HF hospitalization, urgent HF visit, or outpatient oral diuretic intensification) and the effect of finerenone on outpatient oral diuretic intensification alone or as part of an extended composite outcome with primary outcome events were evaluated. Results: A total of 6001 participants (mean [SD] age, 72.0 [9.6] years; 2732 [46%] female) were enrolled. First worsening HF events included 664 HF hospitalizations, 87 urgent HF visits, and 1250 oral diuretic intensifications. Rates of death were higher following worsening HF: 27.7 (95% CI, 24.3-31.5) per 100 patient-years after HF hospitalization, 13.6 (95% CI, 8.8-21.1) per 100 patient-years after urgent HF visit, and 11.6 (95% CI, 10.2-13.1) per 100 patient-years after outpatient oral diuretic intensification compared with 4.5 (95% CI, 4.2-4.9) per 100 patient-years for patients without worsening HF. Adding outpatient oral diuretic intensification to the primary outcome increased the number of patients experiencing events from 1343 to 2238. Finerenone reduced outpatient oral diuretic intensification alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89 [95% CI, 0.80-0.98]; P = .02) and in an extended composite outcome that further included cardiovascular death, HF hospitalization, and urgent HF visit (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.78-0.92]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Outpatient worsening HF events requiring oral diuretic intensification were common, associated with poor prognosis, and reduced by finerenone in patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».