MétaCan
← tous les travaux

Environmental Design Considerations Using an Equivalency Index between Granular Drainage and Geosynthetic Alternatives

2025· article· en· 0 citations· W4407996058 sur OpenAlex· 10.1061/9780784485972.047

Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

Affiliation canadienneUne personne signataire a déclaré un établissement canadien. C'est la seule voie dont dispose la base habituelle.

Le tri à trois modèles

les 1 000 travaux triés →

Les trois modèles l'ont jugé hors champ.

strate : aff_core · poids de sondage : 5595.24 (l'échantillon est stratifié ; tout taux calculé sans le poids est faux)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

Civil engineering study of drainage material equivalency; the object is geotechnical design, not research practice.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

The study examines drainage design and geosynthetic materials, not research practice.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

Civil engineering study of drainage-layer equivalency and environmental benefits of geosynthetics; object is design practice, not research itself.

Résumé

Effective drainage is essential in civil engineering projects, and the design is influenced by the required capacity, inflow rates, and the geometric configuration of the structure. Reduction factors are applied based on material and application. Drainage layers can be granular or geosynthetic, with granular layers using free-draining aggregates and geocomposites comprising non-woven geotextiles and drainage cores or pipes. This study aims to establish equivalency between granular layers and geocomposites in water drainage and gas transport, assuming equal long-term capacity under identical conditions. Despite reduction factors and safety margins, geocomposites significantly reduce drainage layer thickness compared to granular layers. The methodology adopted in this project is to present an equivalency design between granular drainage aggregates and drainage geocomposite and environmental benefit of using geosynthetics as a drainage design solution. This is supported by practical examples and environmental benefits such as reduced aggregate extraction, transportation, greenhouse gas emissions, and construction time for similar or better drainage capacity.

Conservé avec la notice de tri, où il sert de preuve aux étiquettes ci-dessus.

La notice

Revue
Thématique
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Domaine
Engineering
Établissements canadiens
CTT Group (Canada)
Organismes subventionnaires
Mots-clés
Index (typography)DrainageGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceCivil engineeringWorld Wide WebEcology
Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
oui