Achieving 30 by 30: Legal Obligations and the Role of Bst Scientific Evidence Available
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Despite global efforts, States have not met the 10% Ocean protection target set for 2020. With only 8.2% of the Ocean and a mere 2.4% of the High Seas protected today, achieving the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) goal of designating 30% of the Ocean as MPAs by 2030 remains a distant prospect. A key barrier to effective marine protection lies in the lack of enforcement of obligations and the failure of States to adhere to the best scientific evidence available.In May 2024, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) issued an Advisory Opinion on States' obligations to protect and preserve the marine environment under Art. 192 ff of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, specifically in relation to climate change. The Opinion’s central findings were twofold: States must adopt specific measures to meet their obligations to protect and preserve the marine environment, and these measures must be guided by the best scientific evidence available.Drawing from this Advisory Opinion and her internationally acclaimed thesis, The Designation of MPAs: A Legally Binding Obligation (Springer Nature 2023), Dr. Anna von Rebay will demonstrate in this keynote presentation how these principles apply to other significant stressors of the marine environment, particularly bottom trawling and workshop how States’ binding obligations to protect the marine environment can and should be implemented.Scientific evidence on the destructive impact of bottom trawling on the marine environment is undeniable, yet it remains underrepresented in global decision-making. Findings include that deep-sea coral and seamount ecosystems are widespread throughout the world’s Ocean; bottom trawl fishing thereby poses a major threat to the biodiversity of vulnerable deep-sea habitats and ecosystems. Losses of up to 95-98% of the coral cover of seamounts as a result of deep-sea bottom trawl fishing have been documented. High seas bottom trawl fishing led to the serial or sequential depletion of targeted deep-sea fish stocks, while producing a large amount of untargeted bycatch.This keynote will provide a vital impetus for OOS 2025, urging the international community to fully acknowledge and enforce the binding legal framework governing Ocean protection. The proposed outcome of the town hall is to inspire ideas for how coastal and other communities can leverage international obligations to hold governments accountable for using the best scientific evidence to protect, restore, and sustainably use marine ecosystems. This will deliver a compelling call to action, underscoring that the 30 by 30 target is not merely an aspirational goal but a legally binding duty. Immediate, effective action is essential to avoid international liability, ensure compliance with UNCLOS, and secure meaningful protection for our Ocean. By advocating a global ban on bottom trawling, backed by the best scientific evidence available, this town hall promotes the creation of the world’s largest MPA and contributes to achieving the 30 by 30 objective.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».