MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4408924935 · doi:10.33137/cpoj.v8i1.43073

THE ROLE OF HUMAN THERMOREGULATION IN THERMAL DISCOMFORT IN LOWER-LIMB PROSTHETICS: A SCOPING REVIEW

2025· review· en· W4408924935 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
R. H. T. Edwards, Laura Murray, Arjan Buis

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal · 2025
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCINAHLPsycINFOThermoregulationMEDLINEMedicineCritical appraisalPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPopulationThermal comfortProsthesisPhysical therapyPsychologyApplied psychologyPsychological interventionSurgeryAlternative medicineNursingPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Thermal discomfort is one of the most prevalent issues experienced by lower-limb prosthetic users where, on average, 54% of users report thermal-related issues. This arises from wearing a prosthetic socket, which may disrupt the thermoregulatory system due to the low thermal conductivity of materials used in prosthetic sockets and liners. Despite the reported prevalence, there is little understanding of the impact of wearing a prosthesis on the body’s thermoregulatory system and how users perceive thermal discomfort. OBJECTIVE(S): This review aimed to evaluate the current understanding of how human thermoregulation correlates with subjective measures of thermal discomfort among lower-limb prosthetic users. It sought to gain a deeper understanding of how thermoregulatory parameters compare and relate to the subjective experience of thermal discomfort in this population. METHODOLOGY: The study design followed a scoping review structure to identify gaps in knowledge on the topic. A literature search was conducted across five online databases: Medline (ProQuest), EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL and PsycINFO. The searches covered literature from the earliest available date in each database up until February 2024. A search strategy was created to identify the relevant literature. An inclusion/exclusion criterion was then applied to identify studies that only measured either physiological or psychological aspects of thermoregulation and compared these aspects to thermal discomfort/comfort feedback. The QualSyst critical appraisal tool was used to gain quality score for each included article. FINDINGS: 8 articles were identified for inclusion in this review, confirming a dearth in research into how wearing a prosthesis affects thermoregulation at the body/device interface (BDI) and the perception of thermal discomfort. Furthermore, it raised question to the relevance of using residual limb skin temperature measurements to assess thermal discomfort in lower-limb prosthetics. Perspiration at the BDI emerged as a potentially significant contributor to thermal discomfort, a consensus reflected in the literature. CONCLUSION: Despite significant technological advancements, thermal discomfort remains a persistent issue. Therefore, further research is warranted to further understand how wearing a prosthesis affects the thermoregulatory system, enabling the development of innovative components which can mitigate thermal discomfort and in turn improve the quality of life of lower-limb prosthetic users. Layman's Abstract The prosthetic limb attaches to the body by placing the remaining part of the leg into a rigid shell known as the socket, often accompanied by a flexible liner in between. The nature of wearing a prosthetic device often leads to temperature-related unpleasantness known as thermal discomfort. Despite the prevalence of the issue, there is a limited understanding of how wearing a prosthesis impacts the body’s temperature management system, and how users perceive thermal discomfort. This scoping review explored the current literature regarding temperature management and thermal discomfort in lower-limb prosthetics. An electronic literature review was performed in five databases. After reviewing the literature, relevant studies that fit the inclusion criteria were included after the final extraction process. This review highlights thermal challenges faced by lower-limb prosthetic users, revealing a potential gap in understanding how wearing a prosthesis affects the body’s temperature management system due to the low number of eligible articles identified. Furthermore, it raises questions on the relevance of using temperature measurements taken between the skin and the prosthesis to assess thermal discomfort due to conflicting evidence observed in the literature. Despite significant technological advancements aiming to reduce the thermal discomfort regularly experienced by prosthetic users, it remains a persistent issue. Therefore, further research is warranted to understand how wearing a prosthesis affects the body’s temperature management system, enabling the development of new components which can reduce thermal discomfort and in turn improve the quality of life of lower-limb prosthetic users. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/43073/33747 How To Cite: Edwards R, Murray L, Buis A. The role of human thermoregulation in thermal discomfort in lower-limb prosthetics: A scoping review. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2025; Volume 8, Issue 1, No.3. Https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v8i1.43073 Corresponding Author: Professor Arjan Buis, PhDDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland.E-Mail: arjan.buis@strath.ac.ukORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3947-293X

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,921
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,287
Écart entre enseignants0,277 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeAutre devis
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics JournalMême sujetProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsTravaux en français237 207