MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408924935 · doi:10.33137/cpoj.v8i1.43073

THE ROLE OF HUMAN THERMOREGULATION IN THERMAL DISCOMFORT IN LOWER-LIMB PROSTHETICS: A SCOPING REVIEW

2025· review· en· W4408924935 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
R. H. T. Edwards, Laura Murray, Arjan Buis

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCINAHLPsycINFOThermoregulationMEDLINEMedicineCritical appraisalPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPopulationThermal comfortProsthesisPhysical therapyPsychologyApplied psychologyPsychological interventionSurgeryAlternative medicineNursingPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Thermal discomfort is one of the most prevalent issues experienced by lower-limb prosthetic users where, on average, 54% of users report thermal-related issues. This arises from wearing a prosthetic socket, which may disrupt the thermoregulatory system due to the low thermal conductivity of materials used in prosthetic sockets and liners. Despite the reported prevalence, there is little understanding of the impact of wearing a prosthesis on the body’s thermoregulatory system and how users perceive thermal discomfort. OBJECTIVE(S): This review aimed to evaluate the current understanding of how human thermoregulation correlates with subjective measures of thermal discomfort among lower-limb prosthetic users. It sought to gain a deeper understanding of how thermoregulatory parameters compare and relate to the subjective experience of thermal discomfort in this population. METHODOLOGY: The study design followed a scoping review structure to identify gaps in knowledge on the topic. A literature search was conducted across five online databases: Medline (ProQuest), EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL and PsycINFO. The searches covered literature from the earliest available date in each database up until February 2024. A search strategy was created to identify the relevant literature. An inclusion/exclusion criterion was then applied to identify studies that only measured either physiological or psychological aspects of thermoregulation and compared these aspects to thermal discomfort/comfort feedback. The QualSyst critical appraisal tool was used to gain quality score for each included article. FINDINGS: 8 articles were identified for inclusion in this review, confirming a dearth in research into how wearing a prosthesis affects thermoregulation at the body/device interface (BDI) and the perception of thermal discomfort. Furthermore, it raised question to the relevance of using residual limb skin temperature measurements to assess thermal discomfort in lower-limb prosthetics. Perspiration at the BDI emerged as a potentially significant contributor to thermal discomfort, a consensus reflected in the literature. CONCLUSION: Despite significant technological advancements, thermal discomfort remains a persistent issue. Therefore, further research is warranted to further understand how wearing a prosthesis affects the thermoregulatory system, enabling the development of innovative components which can mitigate thermal discomfort and in turn improve the quality of life of lower-limb prosthetic users. Layman's Abstract The prosthetic limb attaches to the body by placing the remaining part of the leg into a rigid shell known as the socket, often accompanied by a flexible liner in between. The nature of wearing a prosthetic device often leads to temperature-related unpleasantness known as thermal discomfort. Despite the prevalence of the issue, there is a limited understanding of how wearing a prosthesis impacts the body’s temperature management system, and how users perceive thermal discomfort. This scoping review explored the current literature regarding temperature management and thermal discomfort in lower-limb prosthetics. An electronic literature review was performed in five databases. After reviewing the literature, relevant studies that fit the inclusion criteria were included after the final extraction process. This review highlights thermal challenges faced by lower-limb prosthetic users, revealing a potential gap in understanding how wearing a prosthesis affects the body’s temperature management system due to the low number of eligible articles identified. Furthermore, it raises questions on the relevance of using temperature measurements taken between the skin and the prosthesis to assess thermal discomfort due to conflicting evidence observed in the literature. Despite significant technological advancements aiming to reduce the thermal discomfort regularly experienced by prosthetic users, it remains a persistent issue. Therefore, further research is warranted to understand how wearing a prosthesis affects the body’s temperature management system, enabling the development of new components which can reduce thermal discomfort and in turn improve the quality of life of lower-limb prosthetic users. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/43073/33747 How To Cite: Edwards R, Murray L, Buis A. The role of human thermoregulation in thermal discomfort in lower-limb prosthetics: A scoping review. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2025; Volume 8, Issue 1, No.3. Https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v8i1.43073 Corresponding Author: Professor Arjan Buis, PhDDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland.E-Mail: arjan.buis@strath.ac.ukORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3947-293X

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics JournalSame topicProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsFrench-language works237,207