Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.0 (PedsQL™) Cancer Module
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Pediatric cancer significantly impacts children's physical, emotional, and social well-being, making quality of life (QoL) assessment essential. The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.0 (PedsQL™ 3.0) includes both child self-report and parent proxy versions, which are widely used to evaluate QoL in children with chronic conditions, including cancer. However, validating its psychometric properties across different cultural contexts is necessary. Materials and Methods: A methodological research design was employed for a sample of 200 participants including 100 inpatient children with cancer (mean age ± SD: 9.30 ± 1.85 years) and their mothers (mean age ± SD: 33.61 ± 6.03 years). The content, face, and structural validities of the study were assessed using exploratory factor analyses. The test reliability was also measured through internal consistency calculated with Cronbach's alpha. Moreover, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the test-retest reliability. Results: The results of the study demonstrated acceptable content and face validity for both the child and mother versions of the instrument. The structural validity analysis revealed a five-factor structure for the child version and a six-factor structure for the mother version. The reliability of the instrument was confirmed with satisfactory Cronbach's alpha values (α = 0.85) for both versions, indicating strong internal consistency. Additionally, the inter-rater reliability was assessed with ICC. The assessments yielded the values of 0.87 for the child version and 0.88 for the mother version, suggesting excellent agreement. Conclusion: The Persian version of the PedsQL™ 3.0 is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the quality of life in children with cancer and their mothers. Background: Pediatric cancer significantly impacts children's physical, emotional, and social well-being, making quality of life (QoL) assessment essential. The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 3.0 (PedsQL™ 3.0) includes both child self-report and parent proxy versions, which are widely used to evaluate QoL in children with chronic conditions, including cancer. However, validating its psychometric properties across different cultural contexts is necessary. Materials and Methods: A methodological research design was employed for a sample of 200 participants including 100 inpatient children with cancer (mean age ± SD: 9.30 ± 1.85 years) and their mothers (mean age ± SD: 33.61 ± 6.03 years). The content, face, and structural validities of the study were assessed using exploratory factor analyses. The test reliability was also measured through internal consistency calculated with Cronbach's alpha. Moreover, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the test-retest reliability. Results: The results of the study demonstrated acceptable content and face validity for both the child and mother versions of the instrument. The structural validity analysis revealed a five-factor structure for the child version and a six-factor structure for the mother version. The reliability of the instrument was confirmed with satisfactory Cronbach's alpha values (α = 0.85) for both versions, indicating strong internal consistency. Additionally, the inter-rater reliability was assessed with ICC. The assessments yielded the values of 0.87 for the child version and 0.88 for the mother version, suggesting excellent agreement. Conclusion: The Persian version of the PedsQL™ 3.0 is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the quality of life in children with cancer and their mothers.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,016 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».