MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4409233509 · doi:10.1186/s40900-024-00663-2

Solutions for Kids in Pain: Embedding and actioning patient partnership in a national knowledge mobilization network

2025· letter· en· W4409233509 sur OpenAlexafffundabout
Dawn P. Richards, Christine T. Chambers, Isabel Jordán, Kimberly Strain, Raad Fadaak, Louise Tunnah, Emily Gruenwoldt, Kathryn A. Birnie

Notice bibliographique

RevueResearch Involvement and Engagement · 2025
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePediatric Pain Management Techniques
Établissements canadiensUniversity of CalgaryAbbotsford Veterinary ClinicSquamish NationCARE CanadaDalhousie UniversityVale (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesHealth Canada
Mots-clésMobilizationGeneral partnershipEmbeddingMedicineBusinessComputer sciencePolitical scienceArtificial intelligence

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Patient engagement is now often expected or required by funders for research projects, initiatives, or networks. Solutions for Kids in Pain (SKIP) is a national knowledge mobilization network in Canada that is on a mission to mobilize evidence-based solutions in children’s pain through coordination and collaboration. SKIP began as a Networks of Centres of Excellence-Knowledge Mobilization (NCE-KM) network from 2019 to 2024 and continues as a university-based centre. SKIP was built on a foundation of engaging with patients (children and youth) and caregivers (parents) primarily guided by the Patients Included™ charter. This paper shares SKIP’s leading approach to patient partnership during its time as a NCE-KM network. As required by its NCE funding, SKIP was hosted by an academic institution (Dalhousie University) and co-led by a knowledge user partner (Children’s Healthcare Canada), with six hubs across Canada. Here, we demonstrate how SKIP integrated patient partners through its governance, management, committees, and KM activities. We also discuss patient partnership resources developed by SKIP to support its implementation of quality patient partnership practices. Three case examples show in detail how SKIP tailored and evolved its patient partnership approach to specific projects and context. These examples include SKIP’s Patient and Caregiver Advisory Committee, a national Youth in Pain project, and integrating patient partners in the co-development of Canada’s first national health standard for Pediatric Pain Management. Each case demonstrates foundational principles to SKIP’s patient partnership including providing compensation and efforts to create safe and inclusive spaces. SKIP’s commitment to patient partnership is actioned through integrating patient partners throughout all aspects of its work. We share insights gained from SKIP’s patient partnership activities during its time as an NCE-KM network, including developed resources and practices. We encourage others to adopt and adapt our learnings and resources for their own work. As SKIP’s NCE-KM funding and structure ends and the organization continues as a university-based centre, SKIP remains committed to developing and sharing leading patient partnership practices. Patient engagement is now often expected in research projects, initiatives, or networks. Solutions for Kids in Pain (SKIP) is a network in Canada whose purpose is to mobilize research findings into the hands of people who can use and benefit from it. SKIP’s first five years from 2019 to 2024 were as a Network of Centres of Excellence-Knowledge Mobilization (NCE-KM) network. Although SKIP continues as a university-based centre, we are taking this opportunity as the NCE-KM funding and structure end to share SKIP’s leading approach to patient partnership. We want others involved in research and knowledge mobilization activities, projects, and initiatives to use and benefit from what SKIP has learned. From its start, SKIP engaged with patients (children and youth) and caregivers to develop its mission and vision and build a partnership approach based on the Patients Included™ charter. Patient partners were included throughout SKIP’s governance, management and committees, and in all of its activities. SKIP’s foundational patient partnership principles include providing compensation, covering expenses, and creating a safe space, among others. We share three key examples of patient partnership during SKIP’s time as an NCE-KM that highlight how partnership was tailored, what resources were created, and support structures in place, including: (1) SKIP’s Patient and Caregiver Advisory Committee, (2) the Youth in Pain project, and (3) the national standard for Pediatric Pain Management. Dedicated staff, organizational capacity, and resources are required to integrate quality patient partnerships throughout an organization. Partnerships require ongoing commitments to remain positive, impactful, and sustainable.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,016
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,387
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0160,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,242
Tête enseignante GPT0,429
Écart entre enseignants0,187 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2025
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResearch Involvement and EngagementMême sujetPediatric Pain Management TechniquesTravaux en français237 207