MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409233509 · doi:10.1186/s40900-024-00663-2

Solutions for Kids in Pain: Embedding and actioning patient partnership in a national knowledge mobilization network

2025· letter· en· W4409233509 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Dawn P. Richards, Christine T. Chambers, Isabel Jordán, Kimberly Strain, Raad Fadaak, Louise Tunnah, Emily Gruenwoldt, Kathryn A. Birnie

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Involvement and Engagement · 2025
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Pain Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryAbbotsford Veterinary ClinicSquamish NationCARE CanadaDalhousie UniversityVale (Canada)
FundersHealth Canada
KeywordsMobilizationGeneral partnershipEmbeddingMedicineBusinessComputer sciencePolitical scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patient engagement is now often expected or required by funders for research projects, initiatives, or networks. Solutions for Kids in Pain (SKIP) is a national knowledge mobilization network in Canada that is on a mission to mobilize evidence-based solutions in children’s pain through coordination and collaboration. SKIP began as a Networks of Centres of Excellence-Knowledge Mobilization (NCE-KM) network from 2019 to 2024 and continues as a university-based centre. SKIP was built on a foundation of engaging with patients (children and youth) and caregivers (parents) primarily guided by the Patients Included™ charter. This paper shares SKIP’s leading approach to patient partnership during its time as a NCE-KM network. As required by its NCE funding, SKIP was hosted by an academic institution (Dalhousie University) and co-led by a knowledge user partner (Children’s Healthcare Canada), with six hubs across Canada. Here, we demonstrate how SKIP integrated patient partners through its governance, management, committees, and KM activities. We also discuss patient partnership resources developed by SKIP to support its implementation of quality patient partnership practices. Three case examples show in detail how SKIP tailored and evolved its patient partnership approach to specific projects and context. These examples include SKIP’s Patient and Caregiver Advisory Committee, a national Youth in Pain project, and integrating patient partners in the co-development of Canada’s first national health standard for Pediatric Pain Management. Each case demonstrates foundational principles to SKIP’s patient partnership including providing compensation and efforts to create safe and inclusive spaces. SKIP’s commitment to patient partnership is actioned through integrating patient partners throughout all aspects of its work. We share insights gained from SKIP’s patient partnership activities during its time as an NCE-KM network, including developed resources and practices. We encourage others to adopt and adapt our learnings and resources for their own work. As SKIP’s NCE-KM funding and structure ends and the organization continues as a university-based centre, SKIP remains committed to developing and sharing leading patient partnership practices. Patient engagement is now often expected in research projects, initiatives, or networks. Solutions for Kids in Pain (SKIP) is a network in Canada whose purpose is to mobilize research findings into the hands of people who can use and benefit from it. SKIP’s first five years from 2019 to 2024 were as a Network of Centres of Excellence-Knowledge Mobilization (NCE-KM) network. Although SKIP continues as a university-based centre, we are taking this opportunity as the NCE-KM funding and structure end to share SKIP’s leading approach to patient partnership. We want others involved in research and knowledge mobilization activities, projects, and initiatives to use and benefit from what SKIP has learned. From its start, SKIP engaged with patients (children and youth) and caregivers to develop its mission and vision and build a partnership approach based on the Patients Included™ charter. Patient partners were included throughout SKIP’s governance, management and committees, and in all of its activities. SKIP’s foundational patient partnership principles include providing compensation, covering expenses, and creating a safe space, among others. We share three key examples of patient partnership during SKIP’s time as an NCE-KM that highlight how partnership was tailored, what resources were created, and support structures in place, including: (1) SKIP’s Patient and Caregiver Advisory Committee, (2) the Youth in Pain project, and (3) the national standard for Pediatric Pain Management. Dedicated staff, organizational capacity, and resources are required to integrate quality patient partnerships throughout an organization. Partnerships require ongoing commitments to remain positive, impactful, and sustainable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.387
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.242
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Involvement and EngagementSame topicPediatric Pain Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207