MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4409476142 · doi:10.1007/s13555-025-01395-1

Complete/Near-Complete Itch Response Observed in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Initiating Dupilumab: 3-Year, Real-World, Interim Data from the PROSE Registry

2025· article· en· W4409476142 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Neal Bhatia, Charles Lynde, Luz Fonacier, Liyang Shao, Kwinten Bosman, Andrew Korotzer

Notice bibliographique

RevueDermatology and Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueDermatology and Skin Diseases
Établissements canadiensLynde Centre for DermatologyUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesRegeneron PharmaceuticalsSanofi
Mots-clésDupilumabAtopic dermatitisInterimDermatologyMedicineInterim analysisClinical trialInternal medicineGeography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing disease that can start at any age and has a significant negative impact on quality of life, including a significant itch burden. Here we report the proportion of patients in a real-world study achieving a complete/almost complete resolution of itch, as measured by the Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) and improvement in overall disease severity score (ODS), in patients aged ≥ 12 years with moderate-to-severe AD up to 3 years after commencing dupilumab treatment. PROSE is an ongoing, prospective, observational, multicenter registry in the USA and Canada, collecting real-world data from patients aged ≥ 12 years with moderate-to-severe AD who initiated dupilumab in accordance with country-specific prescribing information. Assessments include patient-reported PP-NRS (range 0–10) and clinician-measured ODS score (range 0–4). A total of 857 patients were enrolled, of whom 42% were male and 6.4% were adolescents aged ≥ 12 to < 18 years. The mean [standard deviation (SD)] age was 40.1 (17.9) years, and the duration of AD was 17.4 (16.2) years. The subsequent mean (SD) duration of dupilumab treatment was 23.1 (13.7) months. The proportion of patients achieving complete/almost complete itch resolution (PP-NRS score of 0 or 1) improved consistently over time, from 2.7% (17/622) of patients at baseline to 56.3% (58/103) at 3 years. Additionally, by year 3, 65.1% (54/83) of patients had an ODS score of no/minimal disease (score of 0 or 1), versus 2.2% (19/852) at baseline. In this real-world setting of the PROSE registry, adult and adolescent patients with moderate-to-severe AD followed up for up to 3 years after the initiation of dupilumab treatment experienced sustained and substantial improvement in pruritus and ODS, using the stringent endpoints of PP-NRS 0 or 1 and ODS 0 or 1. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03428646. Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a long-term condition with rashes, inflammation and intense itching that disturbs sleep and daily activities. Dupilumab is used to treat AD when topical medications are not adequate. Our aim was to find out how many patients showed no or minimal itch and AD severity when patients use dupilumab over the long term in the real world. The PROSE real-world registry collected information on 857 adults and adolescents with AD who were prescribed dupilumab by their doctors. Patients in the registry reported their itch weekly on a scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst possible itch). At the study start, and up to 36 months later, their doctor graded the severity of their AD from 0 (no disease) to 4 (severe disease). We measured how many PROSE patients had no/minimal itch and AD severity (in both cases, scores of 0 or 1) for up to 3 years after they started dupilumab treatment. At the study start, 2.7% of the patients had no or minimal itch. For those patients still being observed after 36 months (about 12% of the starting sample), 56.3% of the patients had no or almost no itch; the severity of AD improved similarly. These results show that many patients with AD receiving dupilumab can experience complete or almost complete itch and/or AD relief, although other medications could also have helped these patients improve. Our results are useful for doctors treating AD.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,781

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,055
Tête enseignante GPT0,305
Écart entre enseignants0,250 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDermatology and TherapyMême sujetDermatology and Skin DiseasesTravaux en français237 207