Association of Primary Care Continuity With Home Dialysis, Transplantation, and Utilization of Medical Services for Patients Starting Hemodialysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Rationale & Objective Primary care may help patients starting dialysis with emotional support and access to health care services. It is unknown whether consistently visiting the same primary care physician (PCP) can strengthen patient confidence to select home dialysis, help facilitate medical appointments for transplantation, or increase care access. Study Design A population-based retrospective cohort study. Setting & Participants Patients initiating maintenance hemodialysis from 2007 to 2017 in Ontario, Canada. Exposure High PCP continuity using the usual provider of care index (an established measure of PCP continuity), defined as>75% of PCP visits with the same PCP in the 2 years before dialysis initiation. Outcomes Primary outcomes were time to home dialysis (peritoneal or hemodialysis) and transplantation. Secondary outcomes included specialist visits, cancer screening, influenza vaccination, and measures of diabetes care. Analytical Approach Propensity scores to match patients with high and low PCP continuity. Results We identified 9,530 matched pairs. High PCP continuity was not associated with increased home dialysis (14.0 events per 100 person-years vs 14.0 events per 100 person-years; subdistribution hazard ratio 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.04) or transplantation (4.3 events per 100 person-years vs 4.5 events per 100 person-years; subdistribution hazard ratio 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90-1.04). High PCP continuity was associated with greater colon cancer screening (hazard ratio 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.14), influenza vaccination (hazard ratio 1.33; 95% CI, 1.27-1.39), and comprehensive diabetes care (hazard ratio 1.23; 95% CI, 1.14-1.33). Limitations Residual confounding is possible. Conclusions High PCP continuity before dialysis initiation was not associated with increased utilization of home dialysis or transplantation but was associated with greater colon cancer screening, influenza vaccination, and comprehensive diabetes care. Additional work is needed to clarify how primary care may best benefit this patient population. Plain Language Summary Patients transitioning to maintenance hemodialysis require comprehensive health care. We investigated how closer relationships with a primary care physician (PCP) may complement nephrologists in caring for this patient population. We used administrative databases in Ontario, Canada, to conduct a retrospective population-based study, assessing how continuity with one PCP influenced the uptake of home dialysis, kidney transplantation, and patient access to health care services. We found that high PCP continuity before dialysis initiation was not associated with increased transition to home dialysis or kidney transplantation but did lead to increases in colon cancer screening, influenza vaccination, and diabetes assessment. Further work is required to determine how PCPs can help nephrologists best serve the multifaceted needs of patients transitioning to maintenance hemodialysis.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».