Association of Primary Care Continuity With Home Dialysis, Transplantation, and Utilization of Medical Services for Patients Starting Hemodialysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rationale & Objective Primary care may help patients starting dialysis with emotional support and access to health care services. It is unknown whether consistently visiting the same primary care physician (PCP) can strengthen patient confidence to select home dialysis, help facilitate medical appointments for transplantation, or increase care access. Study Design A population-based retrospective cohort study. Setting & Participants Patients initiating maintenance hemodialysis from 2007 to 2017 in Ontario, Canada. Exposure High PCP continuity using the usual provider of care index (an established measure of PCP continuity), defined as>75% of PCP visits with the same PCP in the 2 years before dialysis initiation. Outcomes Primary outcomes were time to home dialysis (peritoneal or hemodialysis) and transplantation. Secondary outcomes included specialist visits, cancer screening, influenza vaccination, and measures of diabetes care. Analytical Approach Propensity scores to match patients with high and low PCP continuity. Results We identified 9,530 matched pairs. High PCP continuity was not associated with increased home dialysis (14.0 events per 100 person-years vs 14.0 events per 100 person-years; subdistribution hazard ratio 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.04) or transplantation (4.3 events per 100 person-years vs 4.5 events per 100 person-years; subdistribution hazard ratio 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90-1.04). High PCP continuity was associated with greater colon cancer screening (hazard ratio 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.14), influenza vaccination (hazard ratio 1.33; 95% CI, 1.27-1.39), and comprehensive diabetes care (hazard ratio 1.23; 95% CI, 1.14-1.33). Limitations Residual confounding is possible. Conclusions High PCP continuity before dialysis initiation was not associated with increased utilization of home dialysis or transplantation but was associated with greater colon cancer screening, influenza vaccination, and comprehensive diabetes care. Additional work is needed to clarify how primary care may best benefit this patient population. Plain Language Summary Patients transitioning to maintenance hemodialysis require comprehensive health care. We investigated how closer relationships with a primary care physician (PCP) may complement nephrologists in caring for this patient population. We used administrative databases in Ontario, Canada, to conduct a retrospective population-based study, assessing how continuity with one PCP influenced the uptake of home dialysis, kidney transplantation, and patient access to health care services. We found that high PCP continuity before dialysis initiation was not associated with increased transition to home dialysis or kidney transplantation but did lead to increases in colon cancer screening, influenza vaccination, and diabetes assessment. Further work is required to determine how PCPs can help nephrologists best serve the multifaceted needs of patients transitioning to maintenance hemodialysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".