MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4409644333 · doi:10.63544/ijss.v1i2.101

The Role of AI and Machine Learning in Fortifying Cybersecurity Systems in the US Healthcare Industry

2022· article· en· W4409644333 sur OpenAlexaff
Ananna Mosaddeque, Mantaka Rowshon, Tamim Ahmed, Umma Twaha

Notice bibliographique

RevueInverge Journal of Social Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHealthcare industryHealth careHealthcare systemComputer securityComputer scienceIndustry 4.0Artificial intelligenceBusinessData scienceKnowledge managementPolitical scienceEmbedded systemLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The digital transformation of healthcare has brought about unprecedented advancements, but it has also introduced significant cybersecurity risks. Cyberattacks targeting sensitive patient data, employee information, and critical operational systems are on the rise, demanding innovative and robust security measures. Enter the powerful duo of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML). These cutting-edge technologies offer a powerful arsenal against these cyber threats. AI algorithms can analyse massive datasets from various sources, such as network traffic, user behaviour, and medical device logs, to identify anomalies and detect malicious activity in real-time. This proactive approach allows security teams to swiftly respond to threats, minimizing the impact of cyberattacks and protecting patient safety. Furthermore, AI can leverage threat intelligence from diverse sources, including cybersecurity feeds, social media, and dark web forums, to proactively identify and mitigate emerging threats. This proactive approach empowers healthcare organizations to stay ahead of the curve, anticipating and neutralizing cyberattacks before they can cause significant damage. However, challenges remain. Implementing and maintaining AI/ML-based security solutions requires significant investment, both in terms of infrastructure and skilled personnel. Concerns surrounding data privacy and the potential for algorithmic bias also need careful consideration. Despite these challenges, the potential benefits of AI and ML in healthcare cybersecurity are undeniable. By embracing these technologies, healthcare organizations can enhance patient safety, improve operational efficiency, and build a more secure and resilient future in the face of evolving cyber threats. References Aarav, M., & Layla, R. (2019). Cybersecurity in the cloud era: Integrating AI, firewalls, and engineering for robust protection. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 3(4), 1892-1899. Abie, H. (2019, May). Cognitive cybersecurity for CPS-IoT enabled healthcare ecosystems. In 2019 13th International Symposium on Medical Information and Communication Technology (ISMICT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. Aitazaz, F. (2018). Fortifying technology: Computer science solutions for cyber-attacks and cloud security. Alabdulatif, A., Khalil, I., & Saidur Rahman, M. (2020). Security of blockchain and AI-empowered smart healthcare: Application-based analysis. Applied Sciences, 12(21), 11039. Alizai, S. H., Asif, M., & Rind, Z. K. (2021). Relevance of Motivational Theories and Firm Health. Management (IJM), 12(3), 1130-1137. Asif, M. (2021). Contingent Effect of Conflict Management towards Psychological Capital and Employees’ Engagement in Financial Sector of Islamabad. Preston University, Kohat, Islamabad Campus. Bellamkonda, S. (2020). Cybersecurity in critical infrastructure: Protecting the foundations of modern society. International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security, 12, 273-280. Bibi, P. (2020). AI-powered cybersecurity: Advanced database technologies for robust data protection. Chintala, S. (2020). Data privacy and security challenges in AI-driven healthcare systems in India. Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing, 37(5), 2769-2778. Chirra, D. R. (2021). Mitigating ransomware in healthcare: A cybersecurity framework for critical data protection. Revista de Inteligencia Artificial en Medicina, 12(1), 495-513. Chirra, D. R. (2021). Secure edge computing for IoT systems: AI-powered strategies for data integrity and privacy. Revista de Inteligencia Artificial en Medicina, 13(1), 485-507. Cooper, M. (2020). AI-driven early threat detection: Strengthening cybersecurity ecosystems with proactive cyber defense strategies. Elijah Roy, R. (2021). Harnessing AI and machine learning for enhanced security in cloud infrastructures. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technologies and Innovations, 1(3), 14-28. Fatima, S. (2020). Fortifying the future: Advanced cybersecurity tactics for cloud platforms and device security. Hussain, A. H., Hasan, M. N., Prince, N. U., Islam, M. M., Islam, S., & Hasan, S. K. (2021). Enhancing cyber security using quantum computing and artificial intelligence: A. Hussain, Z., & Khan, S. (2021). AI and cloud security synergies: Building resilient information and network security circulation ecosystems. IBRAHIM, A. (2019). AI armory: Empowering cybersecurity through machine learning. Jimmy, F. (2021). Emerging threats: The latest cybersecurity risks and the role of artificial intelligence in enhancing cybersecurity defenses. Valley International Journal Digital Library, 564-574. Kasula, B. Y. (2017). Machine learning unleashed: Innovations, applications, and impact across industries. International Transactions in Artificial Intelligence, 1(1), 1-7. Maddireddy, B. R., & Maddireddy, B. R. (2021). Enhancing endpoint security through machine learning and artificial intelligence applications. Revista Espanola de Documentacion Cientifica, 15(4), 154-164. Nimmagadda, V. S. P. (2021). Artificial intelligence and block chain integration for enhanced security in insurance: Techniques, models, and real-world applications. African Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Development, 1(2), 187-224. Raza, H. (2021). Proactive cyber defense with AI: Enhancing risk assessment and threat detection in cybersecurity ecosystems. Reddy, A. R. P. (2021). The role of artificial intelligence in proactive cyber threat detection in cloud environments. Neuro Quantology, 19(12), 764-773. Shah, V. (2021). Machine learning algorithms for cybersecurity: Detecting and preventing threats. Revista Espanola de Documentacion Cientifica, 15(4), 42-66. Shukla, A. (2021). Leveraging AI and ML for advance cyber security. Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Cloud Computing. SRC/JAICC-154. DOI: doi.org/10.47363/JAICC/2021 (1), 142, 2-3. Waqas, M., Tu, S., Halim, Z., Rehman, S. U., Abbas, G., & Abbas, Z. H. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in wireless networks security: Principle, practice and challenges. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55(7), 5215-5261. Zygun, D. (2020). Cyber-attack resilience: Fortifying devices and cloud systems with computer science innovations.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,721
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,992

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,143
Tête enseignante GPT0,423
Écart entre enseignants0,280 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInverge Journal of Social SciencesMême sujetArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationTravaux en français237 207