MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409644333 · doi:10.63544/ijss.v1i2.101

The Role of AI and Machine Learning in Fortifying Cybersecurity Systems in the US Healthcare Industry

2022· article· en· W4409644333 on OpenAlexaff
Ananna Mosaddeque, Mantaka Rowshon, Tamim Ahmed, Umma Twaha

Bibliographic record

VenueInverge Journal of Social Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealthcare industryHealth careHealthcare systemComputer securityComputer scienceIndustry 4.0Artificial intelligenceBusinessData scienceKnowledge managementPolitical scienceEmbedded systemLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The digital transformation of healthcare has brought about unprecedented advancements, but it has also introduced significant cybersecurity risks. Cyberattacks targeting sensitive patient data, employee information, and critical operational systems are on the rise, demanding innovative and robust security measures. Enter the powerful duo of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML). These cutting-edge technologies offer a powerful arsenal against these cyber threats. AI algorithms can analyse massive datasets from various sources, such as network traffic, user behaviour, and medical device logs, to identify anomalies and detect malicious activity in real-time. This proactive approach allows security teams to swiftly respond to threats, minimizing the impact of cyberattacks and protecting patient safety. Furthermore, AI can leverage threat intelligence from diverse sources, including cybersecurity feeds, social media, and dark web forums, to proactively identify and mitigate emerging threats. This proactive approach empowers healthcare organizations to stay ahead of the curve, anticipating and neutralizing cyberattacks before they can cause significant damage. However, challenges remain. Implementing and maintaining AI/ML-based security solutions requires significant investment, both in terms of infrastructure and skilled personnel. Concerns surrounding data privacy and the potential for algorithmic bias also need careful consideration. Despite these challenges, the potential benefits of AI and ML in healthcare cybersecurity are undeniable. By embracing these technologies, healthcare organizations can enhance patient safety, improve operational efficiency, and build a more secure and resilient future in the face of evolving cyber threats. References Aarav, M., & Layla, R. (2019). Cybersecurity in the cloud era: Integrating AI, firewalls, and engineering for robust protection. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 3(4), 1892-1899. Abie, H. (2019, May). Cognitive cybersecurity for CPS-IoT enabled healthcare ecosystems. In 2019 13th International Symposium on Medical Information and Communication Technology (ISMICT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. Aitazaz, F. (2018). Fortifying technology: Computer science solutions for cyber-attacks and cloud security. Alabdulatif, A., Khalil, I., & Saidur Rahman, M. (2020). Security of blockchain and AI-empowered smart healthcare: Application-based analysis. Applied Sciences, 12(21), 11039. Alizai, S. H., Asif, M., & Rind, Z. K. (2021). Relevance of Motivational Theories and Firm Health. Management (IJM), 12(3), 1130-1137. Asif, M. (2021). Contingent Effect of Conflict Management towards Psychological Capital and Employees’ Engagement in Financial Sector of Islamabad. Preston University, Kohat, Islamabad Campus. Bellamkonda, S. (2020). Cybersecurity in critical infrastructure: Protecting the foundations of modern society. International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security, 12, 273-280. Bibi, P. (2020). AI-powered cybersecurity: Advanced database technologies for robust data protection. Chintala, S. (2020). Data privacy and security challenges in AI-driven healthcare systems in India. Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing, 37(5), 2769-2778. Chirra, D. R. (2021). Mitigating ransomware in healthcare: A cybersecurity framework for critical data protection. Revista de Inteligencia Artificial en Medicina, 12(1), 495-513. Chirra, D. R. (2021). Secure edge computing for IoT systems: AI-powered strategies for data integrity and privacy. Revista de Inteligencia Artificial en Medicina, 13(1), 485-507. Cooper, M. (2020). AI-driven early threat detection: Strengthening cybersecurity ecosystems with proactive cyber defense strategies. Elijah Roy, R. (2021). Harnessing AI and machine learning for enhanced security in cloud infrastructures. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technologies and Innovations, 1(3), 14-28. Fatima, S. (2020). Fortifying the future: Advanced cybersecurity tactics for cloud platforms and device security. Hussain, A. H., Hasan, M. N., Prince, N. U., Islam, M. M., Islam, S., & Hasan, S. K. (2021). Enhancing cyber security using quantum computing and artificial intelligence: A. Hussain, Z., & Khan, S. (2021). AI and cloud security synergies: Building resilient information and network security circulation ecosystems. IBRAHIM, A. (2019). AI armory: Empowering cybersecurity through machine learning. Jimmy, F. (2021). Emerging threats: The latest cybersecurity risks and the role of artificial intelligence in enhancing cybersecurity defenses. Valley International Journal Digital Library, 564-574. Kasula, B. Y. (2017). Machine learning unleashed: Innovations, applications, and impact across industries. International Transactions in Artificial Intelligence, 1(1), 1-7. Maddireddy, B. R., & Maddireddy, B. R. (2021). Enhancing endpoint security through machine learning and artificial intelligence applications. Revista Espanola de Documentacion Cientifica, 15(4), 154-164. Nimmagadda, V. S. P. (2021). Artificial intelligence and block chain integration for enhanced security in insurance: Techniques, models, and real-world applications. African Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Development, 1(2), 187-224. Raza, H. (2021). Proactive cyber defense with AI: Enhancing risk assessment and threat detection in cybersecurity ecosystems. Reddy, A. R. P. (2021). The role of artificial intelligence in proactive cyber threat detection in cloud environments. Neuro Quantology, 19(12), 764-773. Shah, V. (2021). Machine learning algorithms for cybersecurity: Detecting and preventing threats. Revista Espanola de Documentacion Cientifica, 15(4), 42-66. Shukla, A. (2021). Leveraging AI and ML for advance cyber security. Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Cloud Computing. SRC/JAICC-154. DOI: doi.org/10.47363/JAICC/2021 (1), 142, 2-3. Waqas, M., Tu, S., Halim, Z., Rehman, S. U., Abbas, G., & Abbas, Z. H. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in wireless networks security: Principle, practice and challenges. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55(7), 5215-5261. Zygun, D. (2020). Cyber-attack resilience: Fortifying devices and cloud systems with computer science innovations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInverge Journal of Social SciencesSame topicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationFrench-language works237,207