MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4409645014 · doi:10.63544/ijss.v3i2.82

The public sphere on a digital plane: The influence of the new digital media on Ghana’s democracy and the Public Sphere

2024· article· en· W4409645014 sur OpenAlexaff
Ernest Darkwa, Hrishikesh Inguva, Constance Osafo-Adjei, Bridget Acquah

Notice bibliographique

RevueInverge Journal of Social Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSocial Media and Politics
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPublic sphereDemocracyDigital mediaPolitical sciencePlane (geometry)Media studiesSociologyMathematicsLawGeometryPolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This paper examines how social media is providing a new digital public sphere and shaping the democratic process in Ghana. It draws on Habermas's public sphere theory to explore how social media has occupied a digital public sphere that creates spaces for democratic participation and public discourse. The paper reviews relevant literature on social media use as a tool of political communication, the new digital public sphere, and the democratic process in Ghana and globally. Since Ghana's return to democratic rule in 1992, the media landscape was initially dominated by traditional state and private media outlets. However, the rise of digital and social media over the past two decades has transformed the public sphere, creating online spaces for citizens to engage in political deliberations and share diverse viewpoints. The paper examines how social media played a crucial role in Ghana's 2020 elections, facilitating citizen political participation, public opinion formation, and activism despite COVID-19 restrictions on physical gatherings. Social media enabled political parties to campaign online, citizens to voice concerns, and interest groups to mobilize protests and demand accountability. While acknowledging the digital divide and attempts by political elites to control narratives, the paper argues that social media's interactive and connective structure has enhanced the public sphere by dismantling dominant discourses and amplifying alternative perspectives. The paper concludes by recommending robust fact-checking mechanisms and collaborative efforts from government, civil society, media, and interest groups to strengthen the digital public sphere's role in consolidating Ghana's democracy. Overall, it highlights social media's transformative impact on Ghana's public sphere and democratic processes. References Abdulai, A. G., & Sackeyfio, N. (2022). Introduction: The uncertainties of Ghana’s 2020 elections. African Affairs, 121(484), e25-e53. Agomor, K. S. (2023). An Analysis of Public Participation in Policymaking Processes. In Public Policy in Ghana: Conceptual and Practical Insights (pp. 283-304). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Alhassan, R. (2021). Fact-checking Ghana’s social media elections.Ghana Fact. (Accessed on April 03, 2024) from https://ghanafact.com/2021/01fact-checking-ghanas-social-media-elections/ Amankwah, A. S., & Mbatha, B. (2019). Unlocking the potential of new media technologies for political communication about elections in ghana. Communicatio, 45(4), 44-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2019.1639782 Anaman, G., Allor, P., & Kuffuor, O. (2023). International remittances and political participation in Ghana. Scientific African, 22, e01941. Anim, P. A., Asiedu, F. O., Adams, M., Acheampong, G., & Boakye, E. (2019). “Mind the gap”: To succeed in marketing politics, think of social media innovation. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 36(6), 806-817. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-10-2017-2409 Asif, D. M., & Sandhu, M. S. (2023). Social Media Marketing Revolution in Pakistan: A Study of its Adoption and Impact on Business Performance. Journal of Business Insight and Innovation, 2(2), 67–77. Retrieved from https://insightfuljournals.com/index.php/JBII/article/view/23 Asif, M. (2022). Integration of Information Technology in Financial Services and its Adoption by the Financial Sector in Pakistan. Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 1(2), 23–35. Retrieved from https://invergejournals.com/index.php/ijss/article/view/31 Asif, M., Adil Pasha, M., Shafiq, S., & Craine, I. (2022). Economic Impacts of Post COVID-19. Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 56–65. Retrieved from https://invergejournals.com/index.php/ijss/article/view/6 Atengble, K. (2014). Social Media and Ghana’s 2012 Election Petition—A Discussion. Advances in Journalism and Communication, 2(03), 121-123. Boateng, J. K., Boadi, C., Boateng, J., & Darkwa, E. (2024). Social Media and Electoral Disagreements in Ghana’s 2020 Election. In Communication and Electoral Politics in Ghana: Interrogating Transnational Technology, Discourse and Multimodalities (pp. 91-118). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Boateng, E. A. (2022). The Ghanaian Social Media Space: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. News Ghana. (Accessed on February 02, 2024) from https:/newsghana.com.gh/the-ghanaian-social-media-space-thegood-thebad-and-the-ugly/ Bokor, M. J. (2015). New media and democratization in Ghana: An impetus for political activism. Net Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 1-16. Bruns, A., & Highfield, T. (2015). Is Habermas on Twitter? Social media and the public sphere. In The Routledge companion to social media and politics, pp.56-73. Routledge. Calhoun, C. (1993). Civil society and the public sphere. Public Culture, 5(2), 267-280. Callamard, A. (2010). Accountability, transparency, and freedom of expression in Africa. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 77(4), 1211-1240. Cheeseman, N., Fisher, J., Hassan, I., & Hitchen, J. (2020). Nigeria's WhatsApp Politics. J. Democracy, 31, 145. Dahlgren, P. (2012). Public intellectuals, online media, and public spheres: Current realignments. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 25(4), 95-110. Dankwah, J. B., & Mensah, K. (2021). Political marketing and social media influence on young voters in Ghana. SN Social Sciences, 1(6), 152. Datareportal.com. (2024). Ghana Digital Data. GlobalDigitalInsights. Dataportal.com. Dillon, S. (2012). To What Extent Was the Internet a Factor for Barack Obama in Becoming the Democratic Party’s Nominee for the 2008 US Presidential Elections? POLIS Journal, 7, 165-210. Dzisah, W. S. (2018). Social media and elections in Ghana: Enhancing democratic participation. African Journalism Studies, 39(1), 27-47. Dzisah, W. S. (2023). Public Policymaking in the Age of New Media. In Public Policy in Ghana: Conceptual and Practical Insights (pp. 221-236). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Fisher, J., Gadjanova, E., & Hitchen, J. (2023). WhatsApp and political communication in West Africa: Accounting for differences in parties’ organization and message discipline online. Party Politics, 13540688231188690. Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existingdemocracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp.109–142). Cam-bridge, MA: MIT Press. Fraser, N. (2020). Transnationalizing the public sphere: On the legitimacy and efficacy of public opinion in a post-Westphalian world. In Habermas and Law (pp. 379-402). Routledge. Frimpong, A. N.K., Li, P., Nyame, G., & Hossin, M. A. (2022). The impact of social media political activists on voting patterns. Political Behavior, 1-54. Gadjanova, E., Lynch, G., Reifler, J., & Saibu, G. (2019). Social media, cyber battalions, and political mobilisation in Ghana. Exeter: University of Exeter.https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24383.25766 Gadjanova, E., Lynch, G., & Saibu, G. (2022). Misinformation across digital divides: theory and evidence from northern Ghana. African Affairs, 121(483), 161-195. Gupta, M. (2011). The Radia Tapes, WikiLeaks and Insurgent Media. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(4), 10-12. Gyampo, R. E. V. (2017a). Social media, traditional media, and party politics in Ghana. Africa Review, 9(2), 125-139. Gyampo, R. E.V. (2017b). Political parties and social media in Ghana. Africology: The Journal of Pan African Stu, 10. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a cat-egory of bourgeois society (T. Burger, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Institute for Democratic Governance (IDEG). (2020). Training Workshop for Political Parties on the Usage of the Virtual Public Space for the 2020 Elections. Accra: IDEG. (Accessed on April 06, 2024) from https://ideg.org/publications/paper006/ Kang, J. (2010). The media and the crisis of democracy: rethinking aesthetic politics. Theoria, 57(124), 1-22. Kumi, E. (2022). Pandemic democracy: The nexus of covid-19, shrinking civic space for civil society organizations and the 2020 elections in ghana. Democratization, 29(5), 939-957. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.2020251 Laary, D. (2022). Ghanaian journalists face a crackdown on free speech. Development and cooperation. (Accessed April 04, 2024 from https://www.dandc.eu/en/article/press-freedom-ghana-taking-step backwards-journalists-are-being-prosecuted-under-criminal Lynch, G., Saibu, G., & Gadjanova, E. (2022). WhatsApp and political messaging at the periphery: Insights from northern Ghana. Zed Books/Bloomsbury Publishing. Najatu, U., Chentiba, A. T., & Mumuni, E. (2024). Dialogic Communication on Digital Platforms as Public Relations Technique: A Case of Two Political Parties. In Communication and Electoral Politics in Ghana: Interrogating Transnational Technology, Discourse and Multimodalities (pp. 119-139). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Nutsugah, N., Kuupuolo, E., & Peculiar, T. (2024). A systematic review of social media research in Ghana: gaps and future research avenues. Annals of the International Communication Association, 1-15. Oluwole, M. (2016). An Overview of The Freedom of Information Act, An Appraisal from a Lawyer’s Perspective, Lagos: SPA Ajibade & Co. Roese, V. (2018). 14. You won’t believe how co-dependent they are. In From Media Hype to Twitter Storm (pp. 313-332). Amsterdam University Press. Penplusbytes. (2016). Digital Campaigns and Elections: What works? Policy Briefs. Penplusbytes. Penplusbytes. (2017). Social Media and Political Campaigning in Ghana. Accra: Penplusbytes. (Accessed on April 03, 2024) https://www. penplusbytes.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/SOCIAL-MEDIA-AND-POLITICAL-CAMPAIGNING-IN-GHANA.pdf. Prempeh, C. (2023). Digital Cultures, Voice, and (New) Forms of Civic Participation in Ghana. In Digital Technologies, Elections and Campaigns in Africa (pp. 227-244). Routledge. Shar

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,514
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,007
Communication savante0,0030,001
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,295
Écart entre enseignants0,268 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInverge Journal of Social SciencesMême sujetSocial Media and PoliticsTravaux en français237 207