Abstract CT262: Efficacy and safety of the combination PKMYT1-inhibitor lunresertib and ATR-inhibitor camonsertib in patients with ovarian and endometrial cancers: Phase I MYTHIC study (NCT04855656)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Lunresertib (lunre), a first-in-class PKMYT1 inhibitor, in combination with the ATR inhibitor, camonsertib (cam), is synthetic lethal with CCNE1 amplification, and/or deleterious FBXW7 or PPP2R1A mutations (mut). Here we report updated safety in all patients (pts) treated at an individualized RP2D schedule and efficacy in pts with ovarian (OC) and endometrial cancer (EC) treated at RP2D. Methods: Safety of lunre + cam was analyzed in pts from MYTHIC treated at the RP2D of 80mg BID lunre + 80mg QD cam given 3d on/4d off after individualized schedule optimization, determined by baseline hemoglobin levels (weekly or 2w on/1w off). Efficacy evaluable pts with OC or EC were treated at RP2D and had measurable disease and ≥1 post-baseline scan. Endpoints were response rate (RECISTv1.1 unconfirmed+confirmed), clinical benefit rate (CBR; response per RECISTv1.1 or treatment for ≥16w w/o PD), progression-free survival (PFS), and molecular response rate (MRR; ≥50% decline in circulating tumor DNA). Target and pathway engagement were evaluated by IHC in paired tumor biopsies. Results: As of November 2024, 67 pts received combination lunre + cam at the RP2D after schedule optimization. The most frequent Gr3 TRAE was anemia (26.9%); the only other Gr3+ TRAE occurring in >10% of pts was neutropenia (11.9%). No treatment-related deaths were reported. For pts with platinum-resistant or -ineligible OC (n=24; 100% p53 mut; 71% high-grade serous OC; 54% with ≥3 prior lines of therapy), the response rate was 38%. Tumor shrinkage occurred in 75% of pts. Median time to response [mTTR] was 7w (range: 5-18w) with 44% (4/9) occurring at or after the 2nd assessment. Overall, CBR was 79% with a median (mPFS) of 21w (95%CI: 17-27w). Pts with EC (n=27; 85% p53 mut; none MSI high; 19% carcinosarcoma, 48% serous; 78% with prior ICI; 59% with ≥3 prior lines of therapy), the response rate was 26%. Overall, 70% had reductions in tumor burden. The mTTR was 6w (range: 5-21w) with 29% (2/7) occurring at or after the 2nd assessment, while one pt achieved a CR 12w after initial PR. CBR was 48%, with mPFS of 17w (95%CI: 11-27w). Paired tumor analysis confirmed target engagement (-50% CDK1-Thr14 relative change) in 75% pts (9/12) and DNA damage induction (≥100% γ-H2AX increase) in 43% (6/14). MRR was 57.6% (19/33) across all patients. Conclusions: Lunre + cam is a tolerable and effective oral combination therapy of two novel targeted agents in molecularly-selected OC and EC with poor prognostic features and no approved targeted therapies. Enrollment closed in Dec 2024, the presentation will provide updated data for potential late-stage clinical development. Citation Format: Alison M. Schram, Elizabeth K. Lee, Martin Højgaard, Fiona Simpkins, Patricia LoRusso, Linda R. Duska, Ignacio Garrido-Laguna, Mia C. Weiss, Victoria Mandilaras, Benedito A. Carneiro, Cara A. Mathews, Joan R. Tymon-Rosario, Elia Aguado-Fraile, Sunantha Sethuraman, Isabel Soria-Bretones, Xizi Sun, Paul A. Basciano, Maria Koehler, Nathan Hawkey, Emeline S. Bacqué, Stephanie Lheureux, Timothy A. Yap. Efficacy and safety of the combination PKMYT1-inhibitor lunresertib and ATR-inhibitor camonsertib in patients with ovarian and endometrial cancers: Phase I MYTHIC study (NCT04855656) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT262.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».