Abstract CT088: Clinical validation of a novel blood-based protein multi-analyte test for early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in a large, independent high-risk patient population
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is the third highest cause of cancer mortality in the United States. Detecting PDAC at an earlier stage with the tumor confined to the pancreas and lymph node negative improves 5-year rates from 3% for late-stage diagnosis to 44%. There is no FDA approved early detection blood test for PDAC. IMMNOV-2, a blood-based protein biomarker model comprising ICAM1, TIMP1, CTSD, THBS1 and CA19-9 was previously shown to differentiate early-stage PDAC from high-risk controls with high sensitivity and specificity. The current study aimed to validate the performance of IMMNOV-2 in detecting early-stage pancreatic cancer in a large clinical population independent from which the model was developed. METHODS: This was a multi-institutional blinded study assessing the performance of IMMNOV-2 in patient serum samples to differentiate Stage I and Stage II PDAC cases from non-PDAC controls at high-risk due to familial, genetic, or clinical factors. The model’s performance in the whole patient population was also compared to CA19-9 performance alone. IMMNOV-2 comprises four quantitative ELISAs that measure the concentration of the protein biomarkers in human serum. CA19-9 is measured using a Roche COBAS. A fixed mathematical algorithm is employed to integrate the values of the five biomarkers to calculate a positive or negative call based on a predefined cutoff. RESULTS: 202 Stage I and II PDACs and 864 high-risk controls were enrolled. Assays were performed in a blinded manner. IMMNOV-2 distinguished early-stage PDAC from high-risk controls with 78.2% (95% CI, 71.9-83.7) sensitivity at 93.5% (95% CI, 91.7-95.1) specificity. In contrast, CA19-9 alone differentiated early-stage PDAC from controls with 64% (95% CI, 57.3-71) sensitivity (p<0.001 vs IMMNOV-2) at 94.7% (95% CI, 93-96.1) specificity. Performance between Stage I and Stage II PDAC cases were similar. A pre-planned analysis revealed a decrease of IMMNOV-2 performance with increasing age of samples. In samples collected <5 years before the study (89 cases, 751 high-risk controls), sensitivity and specificity of the test was 82.0% (95% CI, 74-90) and 94.9% (95% CI, 93.1-96.4), respectively, which was significantly better than CA19-9 alone (p<0.001) and performance in samples collected >5 yrs before the study (sensitivity 75.2% (95% CI, 67.3-83.2), specificity 84.0% (95% CI, 77.3-90.8), p<0.001). CONCLUSION: IMMNOV-2 differentiated Stage I and Stage II PDAC from high-risk controls with high accuracy in this large clinical validation study. Model performance was significantly better than CA19-9 alone. Testing in recently collected samples would be consistent with clinical use of the test and results in better performance for detecting early-stage PDAC. These promising data warrant further validation in a next-level study using prospective randomized open blinded endpoint (PROBE) design principles. Citation Format: Bryson Katona, Norma Alonzo Palma, Aimee Lucas, Rosalie Sears, Salvatore Paiella, George Zogopoulos, Eli M. Grindedal, Raymond Wadlow, Erkut Borazanci, Daniel A. Sussman, Ora Gordon, Natasha Kureshi, Lisa Ford, Thomas King, Randall Brand, Diane Simeone. Clinical validation of a novel blood-based protein multi-analyte test for early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in a large, independent high-risk patient population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT088.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».