Investigation of the Thematic and Methodological Trends of Completed Graduate Theses Related to Mathematical Modeling in The Field of Mathematics Education
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The aim of the research is to determine the thematic and methodological trends of completed national and international master's and doctoral theses related to mathematical modeling in the field of mathematics education. Qualitative research method was used in the study, and a case study was adopted as a model. Within the scope of the research, from the master's and doctoral theses published in Turkish and English in the field of mathematics education and training covering the years 2013-2023 (October), in the YÖK National Thesis Center and in the ProQuest database; A total of 197 theses on mathematical modeling were examined with the Thesis Evaluation Form. Mendeley Reference Manager, SPSS Statistics 26 package program and VOSviewer program were used in the analysis of the data. Thematic analysis and content analysis, quotation analysis from bibliometric analysis and keyword analysis were performed. According to the results of the research; It is seen that there was a significant increase in theses related to mathematical modeling in mathematics education, especially in 2019, while the number of theses decreased in 2020 and 2021, and there was a significant increase again in 2022. It has been determined that the majority of studies on mathematical modeling in mathematics education in Turkey are at the master's level, while doctoral studies are more common in the USA and Canada. The university that produces the highest number of theses in the field in related researches is Atatürk University in Turkey and Columbia University abroad. Considering the distribution of the subjects of the researches; The most common issue was the development of modeling activities with 45 studies. When we look at the distribution of learning areas, the most studied area is the subject of "Numbers and Operations" with 58 theses. The most commonly used method is qualitative research with 61.42% and the most common model is case study with 59.39%. It was determined that the most common sample type used in the studies was secondary school students. Content analysis is the most commonly used type of analysis in theses, and GeoGebra is the most commonly used technology. In the context of these results, suggestions were presented to the stakeholders.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle