MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409962341 · doi:10.57135/jier.1667255

Investigation of the Thematic and Methodological Trends of Completed Graduate Theses Related to Mathematical Modeling in The Field of Mathematics Education

2025· article· en· W4409962341 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDisiplinlerarası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Methods and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField (mathematics)Thematic mapMathematics educationGraduate studentsEngineering ethicsSociologyManagement scienceMathematicsPedagogyEngineeringGeographyCartographyPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of the research is to determine the thematic and methodological trends of completed national and international master's and doctoral theses related to mathematical modeling in the field of mathematics education. Qualitative research method was used in the study, and a case study was adopted as a model. Within the scope of the research, from the master's and doctoral theses published in Turkish and English in the field of mathematics education and training covering the years 2013-2023 (October), in the YÖK National Thesis Center and in the ProQuest database; A total of 197 theses on mathematical modeling were examined with the Thesis Evaluation Form. Mendeley Reference Manager, SPSS Statistics 26 package program and VOSviewer program were used in the analysis of the data. Thematic analysis and content analysis, quotation analysis from bibliometric analysis and keyword analysis were performed. According to the results of the research; It is seen that there was a significant increase in theses related to mathematical modeling in mathematics education, especially in 2019, while the number of theses decreased in 2020 and 2021, and there was a significant increase again in 2022. It has been determined that the majority of studies on mathematical modeling in mathematics education in Turkey are at the master's level, while doctoral studies are more common in the USA and Canada. The university that produces the highest number of theses in the field in related researches is Atatürk University in Turkey and Columbia University abroad. Considering the distribution of the subjects of the researches; The most common issue was the development of modeling activities with 45 studies. When we look at the distribution of learning areas, the most studied area is the subject of "Numbers and Operations" with 58 theses. The most commonly used method is qualitative research with 61.42% and the most common model is case study with 59.39%. It was determined that the most common sample type used in the studies was secondary school students. Content analysis is the most commonly used type of analysis in theses, and GeoGebra is the most commonly used technology. In the context of these results, suggestions were presented to the stakeholders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.230
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it