MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4410139551 · doi:10.1093/eep/dvaf014

Metabolomics as the missing piece in epigenetics research

2025· article· en· W4410139551 sur OpenAlexaff
Thomas Kenney, Tony Montina, Gerlinde A. S. Metz

Notice bibliographique

RevueCurrent Zoology · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueNutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Lethbridge
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEpigeneticsComputational biologyBiologyEvolutionary biologyGeneticsGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The study of epigenetics has revolutionized our understanding of how environment, diet, and lifestyle influence health [1, 2]. Experience-dependent and potentially heritable epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation [3], histone modifications [4], and the activity of non-coding RNA [5], regulate the expression of genes involved in cell function, development, aging, and disease [6, 7]. These mechanisms, explored through genomic and transcriptomic approaches, have traditionally been the primary focus of epigenetic research [8]. However, metabolomics, the study of small molecules (metabolites) involved in cellular processes, represents a promising yet underexplored component of the epigenetic landscape [9]. Metabolites act as potential biomarkers of health and disease due to their critical role at the downstream end of the gene–RNA–protein–cell function cascade, making them highly sensitive indicators of gene–environment interactions [10]. For example, the metabolome changes in response to external influences such as physical activity, diet [11, 12], pollutants [13–15], and stress [16–19]. Thus, integrating metabolomics into epigenetic research may help bridge existing knowledge gaps by illuminating how metabolism influences epigenetic regulation—and vice versa—thereby paving the way for therapeutic innovation [20]. Cellular metabolism plays a critical role in epigenetic regulation by producing key metabolites that support epigenetic modifications [21]. Metabolites such as S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM) [22], acetyl-coenzyme A (Acetyl-CoA) [23], nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD⁺) [24], and α-ketoglutarate [25] act as substrates or cofactors for enzymes that modify DNA and histones. SAM serves as a methyl donor for DNA and histone methylation [26], while acetyl-CoA is essential for histone acetylation, influencing chromatin accessibility and transcriptional activity [27]. The interplay between metabolism and epigenetics is particularly relevant in the context of disease. Metabolic perturbations, such as the Warburg effect in cancer, alter the availability of key metabolites such as NAD⁺, pyruvate, and α-ketoglutarate, which can drive maladaptive epigenetic modifications associated with tumour progression [28]. Similarly, dietary influences on metabolite levels are linked to metabolic disorders such as obesity and diabetes. For example, Acetyl-CoA, influenced by carbohydrate and fat intake, and SAM, affected by dietary methyl donors such as folate, choline, and methionine, are both implicated in heightened susceptibility to and progression of these diseases [29]. A study of metabolic dysfunction in pregnancy showed that both carbohydrate and methionine levels were altered in mothers with obesity and gestational diabetes [30]. Altogether, these findings highlight the need for deeper investigation into how metabolites regulate gene expression in both health and disease. Practical applications of metabolomics in clinical research are promising for risk prediction and diagnostic purposes, particularly when metabolomic biomarkers reflect upstream epigenetic changes. Profiling metabolites may help identify epigenetic modifications by detecting changes in specific metabolic pathways, including those related to inflammation [31], DNA methylation [32], and histone acetylation [33]. Moreover, metabolic signatures may reflect experience-dependent epigenetic changes that influence cellular or organ function and the risk of non-communicable diseases. These include epigenetic mechanisms and pathways associated with stress and trauma [34–40], radiation exposure [41], space flight [42], sedentary lifestyle [43], social isolation [44], smoking [45], and malnutrition [46]. Metabolomics, as a source of sensitive and robust biomarkers of pathological changes, holds significant potential for the development of non-invasive diagnostics using blood, saliva, urine, or stool. These approaches may provide insights into epigenetic changes associated with disease predisposition, symptom expression, or recovery, with important implications for clinical management and precision medicine in non-communicable diseases [47]. For instance, in oncology, alterations in specific metabolite profiles, such as 2-hydroxyglutarate and lactate, have been linked to tumour metabolism and epigenetic dysregulation, offering valuable information for the development of targeted therapies [48]. Thus, by characterizing the metabolic and epigenetic landscape of cancer, clinicians may be better equipped to deliver improved and personalized treatment options. Despite its potential for epigenetics research, metabolomics remains underutilized in the field. This is due in large part to the unique challenges metabolomics faces compared to more established approaches such as genomics and transcriptomics. The complexity of connecting single metabolites or metabolic profiles to specific epigenetic modifications requires the use of systems biology methodologies and advanced pathway identification tools. Paired with a demand for interdisciplinary expertise in data science, these obstacles have raised the bar of entry [12]. Nevertheless, recent advances in integrative multi-omics approaches are making it easier to perform comprehensive metabolic and epigenetic analyses [49]​. By improving methods for the creation, analysis, and integration of metabolomics data with other ‘omics’ approaches, the intricate relationships between metabolism and epigenetics will become more clear [50]. Thus, future research will benefit from focusing on the causal pathways by which metabolites regulate epigenetic modifications, and how epigenetic modifications may result in cellular metabolic programming and pathological states [51]. While the integration of metabolomics into epigenetic research is still in its early stages, it represents a rapidly growing frontier in our understanding of genomic regulation. By exploring the links between cellular metabolism and epigenetic mechanisms, metabolomics has the potential to provide novel mechanistic insights into disease processes and to uncover new biomarkers and therapeutic targets for personalized medicine. As technological advancements continue to enhance the precision and accessibility of metabolomic tools, their contribution to epigenetic research is expected to grow, thus offering promising opportunities for future discovery and innovation. Unravelling the complex metabolic pathways underlying disease states will benefit from interdisciplinary collaboration across all ‘omics’ approaches and will help advance clinical solutions for the effective prevention and treatment of non-communicable diseases. Thomas Kenney (Methodology [equal], Writing – original draft [lead], Writing – review & editing [lead]), Tony Montina (Conceptualization [equal], Methodology [equal], Writing – original draft [equal], Writing – review & editing [equal]), and Gerlinde A. S. Metz (Conceptualization [equal], Writing – original draft [equal], Writing – review & editing [equal]) None declared.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,015
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,078

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0150,011
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,010
Communication savante0,0060,019
Science ouverte0,0030,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,013
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,391
Écart entre enseignants0,348 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueCurrent Zoology→Même sujetNutrition, Genetics, and Disease→Travaux en français237 207→