MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410139551 · doi:10.1093/eep/dvaf014

Metabolomics as the missing piece in epigenetics research

2025· article· en· W4410139551 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas Kenney, Tony Montina, Gerlinde A. S. Metz

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Zoology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpigeneticsComputational biologyBiologyEvolutionary biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study of epigenetics has revolutionized our understanding of how environment, diet, and lifestyle influence health [1, 2]. Experience-dependent and potentially heritable epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation [3], histone modifications [4], and the activity of non-coding RNA [5], regulate the expression of genes involved in cell function, development, aging, and disease [6, 7]. These mechanisms, explored through genomic and transcriptomic approaches, have traditionally been the primary focus of epigenetic research [8]. However, metabolomics, the study of small molecules (metabolites) involved in cellular processes, represents a promising yet underexplored component of the epigenetic landscape [9]. Metabolites act as potential biomarkers of health and disease due to their critical role at the downstream end of the gene–RNA–protein–cell function cascade, making them highly sensitive indicators of gene–environment interactions [10]. For example, the metabolome changes in response to external influences such as physical activity, diet [11, 12], pollutants [13–15], and stress [16–19]. Thus, integrating metabolomics into epigenetic research may help bridge existing knowledge gaps by illuminating how metabolism influences epigenetic regulation—and vice versa—thereby paving the way for therapeutic innovation [20]. Cellular metabolism plays a critical role in epigenetic regulation by producing key metabolites that support epigenetic modifications [21]. Metabolites such as S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM) [22], acetyl-coenzyme A (Acetyl-CoA) [23], nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD⁺) [24], and α-ketoglutarate [25] act as substrates or cofactors for enzymes that modify DNA and histones. SAM serves as a methyl donor for DNA and histone methylation [26], while acetyl-CoA is essential for histone acetylation, influencing chromatin accessibility and transcriptional activity [27]. The interplay between metabolism and epigenetics is particularly relevant in the context of disease. Metabolic perturbations, such as the Warburg effect in cancer, alter the availability of key metabolites such as NAD⁺, pyruvate, and α-ketoglutarate, which can drive maladaptive epigenetic modifications associated with tumour progression [28]. Similarly, dietary influences on metabolite levels are linked to metabolic disorders such as obesity and diabetes. For example, Acetyl-CoA, influenced by carbohydrate and fat intake, and SAM, affected by dietary methyl donors such as folate, choline, and methionine, are both implicated in heightened susceptibility to and progression of these diseases [29]. A study of metabolic dysfunction in pregnancy showed that both carbohydrate and methionine levels were altered in mothers with obesity and gestational diabetes [30]. Altogether, these findings highlight the need for deeper investigation into how metabolites regulate gene expression in both health and disease. Practical applications of metabolomics in clinical research are promising for risk prediction and diagnostic purposes, particularly when metabolomic biomarkers reflect upstream epigenetic changes. Profiling metabolites may help identify epigenetic modifications by detecting changes in specific metabolic pathways, including those related to inflammation [31], DNA methylation [32], and histone acetylation [33]. Moreover, metabolic signatures may reflect experience-dependent epigenetic changes that influence cellular or organ function and the risk of non-communicable diseases. These include epigenetic mechanisms and pathways associated with stress and trauma [34–40], radiation exposure [41], space flight [42], sedentary lifestyle [43], social isolation [44], smoking [45], and malnutrition [46]. Metabolomics, as a source of sensitive and robust biomarkers of pathological changes, holds significant potential for the development of non-invasive diagnostics using blood, saliva, urine, or stool. These approaches may provide insights into epigenetic changes associated with disease predisposition, symptom expression, or recovery, with important implications for clinical management and precision medicine in non-communicable diseases [47]. For instance, in oncology, alterations in specific metabolite profiles, such as 2-hydroxyglutarate and lactate, have been linked to tumour metabolism and epigenetic dysregulation, offering valuable information for the development of targeted therapies [48]. Thus, by characterizing the metabolic and epigenetic landscape of cancer, clinicians may be better equipped to deliver improved and personalized treatment options. Despite its potential for epigenetics research, metabolomics remains underutilized in the field. This is due in large part to the unique challenges metabolomics faces compared to more established approaches such as genomics and transcriptomics. The complexity of connecting single metabolites or metabolic profiles to specific epigenetic modifications requires the use of systems biology methodologies and advanced pathway identification tools. Paired with a demand for interdisciplinary expertise in data science, these obstacles have raised the bar of entry [12]. Nevertheless, recent advances in integrative multi-omics approaches are making it easier to perform comprehensive metabolic and epigenetic analyses [49]​. By improving methods for the creation, analysis, and integration of metabolomics data with other ‘omics’ approaches, the intricate relationships between metabolism and epigenetics will become more clear [50]. Thus, future research will benefit from focusing on the causal pathways by which metabolites regulate epigenetic modifications, and how epigenetic modifications may result in cellular metabolic programming and pathological states [51]. While the integration of metabolomics into epigenetic research is still in its early stages, it represents a rapidly growing frontier in our understanding of genomic regulation. By exploring the links between cellular metabolism and epigenetic mechanisms, metabolomics has the potential to provide novel mechanistic insights into disease processes and to uncover new biomarkers and therapeutic targets for personalized medicine. As technological advancements continue to enhance the precision and accessibility of metabolomic tools, their contribution to epigenetic research is expected to grow, thus offering promising opportunities for future discovery and innovation. Unravelling the complex metabolic pathways underlying disease states will benefit from interdisciplinary collaboration across all ‘omics’ approaches and will help advance clinical solutions for the effective prevention and treatment of non-communicable diseases. Thomas Kenney (Methodology [equal], Writing – original draft [lead], Writing – review & editing [lead]), Tony Montina (Conceptualization [equal], Methodology [equal], Writing – original draft [equal], Writing – review & editing [equal]), and Gerlinde A. S. Metz (Conceptualization [equal], Writing – original draft [equal], Writing – review & editing [equal]) None declared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.010
Scholarly communication0.0060.019
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0060.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Zoology→Same topicNutrition, Genetics, and Disease→French-language works237,207→