Long-term efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: an interim analysis of the phase 3 U-ACTIVATE long-term extension study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: The U-ACTIVATE long-term extension study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Here, we report interim results after 3 years of total treatment. METHODS: U-ACTIVATE is an ongoing, 288-week, phase 3, long-term extension study done at 307 centres across 43 countries (active sites on Dec 31, 2021, are presented as part of this interim analysis) and began on Jan 31, 2017. In brief, patients aged 16-75 years with a confirmed diagnosis of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis for 90 days or more, an adapted Mayo score of 5-9, and an endoscopic subscore of 2 or 3 were eligible for the upadacitinib induction studies; patients who had a clinical response in the induction studies were eligible to enter the U-ACHIEVE maintenance study. Individuals who completed the U-ACHIEVE maintenance study were subsequently eligible for inclusion in the efficacy population of this long-term extension study. Patients in clinical remission per adapted Mayo score at week 52 of the maintenance study could continue their double-masked treatment upon entering the long-term extension study. Patients not in clinical remission originally randomly assigned to upadacitinib 15 mg were eligible to escalate to upadacitinib 30 mg, those originally randomly assigned to upadacitinib 30 mg continued on upadacitinib 30 mg, and those originally assigned to placebo were eligible to escalate to upadacitinib 15 mg in a masked way. We present data from weeks 48 and 96 of the long-term extension period. Key efficacy outcomes were clinical remission (per adapted Mayo score), endoscopic remission, maintenance of clinical remission, and maintenance of endoscopic remission, and are presented for those patients who had a clinical response after 8 weeks of upadacitinib 45 mg induction, completed 52 weeks of maintenance (U-ACHIEVE maintenance), and subsequently entered the long-term extension. Safety outcomes were treatment-emergent adverse events and adverse events of special interest, which were prespecified and were recorded in two populations: one comprising patients who received at least one dose of study drug in the long-term extension study and the other comprising all patients in the maintenance or long-term extension studies. Our primary approach for efficacy analysis was as-observed (ie, all observed data were used without imputation for missing data until patients switched to a different dose during the long-term extension study). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03006068). FINDINGS: 414 patients from the phase 3 upadacitinib U-ACHIEVE maintenance study were eligible to enter this long-term extension study for assessment of efficacy endpoints following treatment with upadacitinib. Of these individuals, 369 patients (231 [63%] male individuals and 138 [37%] female individuals) were treated with upadacitinib in the long-term extension study: 142 patients with upadacitinib 15 mg and 227 with upadacitinib 30 mg. In the as-observed population, 84 (71%) of 118 patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg were in clinical remission at week 48, as were 130 (67%) of 193 receiving upadacitinib 30 mg; by week 96, 69 (76%) of 91 patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg and 104 (74%) of 141 of those receiving upadacitinib 30 mg were in clinical remission. Most patients who entered the long-term extension in clinical remission maintained it in the as-observed analysis (week 48 upadacitinib 15 mg 62 [81%] of 77 and upadacitinib 30 mg 90 [81%] of 111; week 96 upadacitinib 15 mg 50 [78%] of 64 and upadacitinib 30 mg 69 [84%] of 82). In the as-observed population, 60 (49%) of 123 patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg and 93 (46%) of 202 receiving upadacitinib 30 mg were in endoscopic remission at week 48; by week 96, 45 (47%) of 95 patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg and 69 (45%) of 153 receiving upadacitinib 30 mg were in endoscopic remission. Most patients who entered the long-term extension in endoscopic remission maintained it in the as-observed analysis (week 48 upadacitinib 15 mg 28 [70%] of 40 and upadacitinib 30 mg 51 [76%] of 67; week 96 upadacitinib 15 mg 20 [65%] of 31 and upadacitinib 30 mg 37 [73%] of 51). In the long-term extension-only safety analysis, we assessed data from 467 patients, representing 1027·9 patient-years of continuous long-term extension exposure on a consistent upadacitinib dose. Treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded at 238·5 events per 100 patient-years for upadacitinib 15 mg and 233·4 events per 100 patient-years for upadacitinib 30 mg. Event rates of serious treatment-emergent adverse events were 11·7 events per 100 patient-years for upadacitinib 15 mg and 12·4 events per 100 patient-years for upadacitinib 30 mg. The most common adverse events of special interest were hepatic disorder, lymphopenia, creatine phosphokinase elevation, serious infection, neutropenia, and herpes zoster. Three treatment-emergent adverse events leading to death were reported in the long-term extension-only safety population. INTERPRETATION: This interim analysis supports the positive long-term risk-benefit profile for upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg among patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. FUNDING: AbbVie.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,011 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».