MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4410477621 · doi:10.56315/pscf6-25heffner

Reconciliation in a Michigan Watershed: Restoring Ken-O-Sha

2025· article· en· W4410477621 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gail Gunst Heffner, David P. Warners

Notice bibliographique

RevuePerspectives on Science and Christian Faith · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWatershedEnvironmental ethicsComputer sciencePhilosophyComputer vision

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

RECONCILIATION IN A MICHIGAN WATERSHED: Restoring Ken-O-Sha by Gail Gunst Heffner and David P. Warners. Michigan State University Press, 2024. 314 pages. Paperback; $29.95. ISBN: 9781611864939. *I am certain, because it piqued my anxious imagination, that I first heard the phrase "reconciliation ecology" from my friend Dave Warners (coauthor). It's at least partly an allusion to the phrase "restoration ecology," which was by then recognized as a subspecialty of applied ecology, even having its own academic journal. Its goal is scientific support for restoring biodiversity and ecosystem function. The problem with restoration ecology is that, while populated with dedicated researchers and practitioners, it struggles with making its case in the wider North American culture. *This new book by Heffner and Warners addresses that issue and is an absolute joy for the hopeful direction it offers. My review copy is well marked up and, having read it twice, I can report that it gets richer on second pass. It too is about restoring biodiversity and ecosystem function, but it probes deeper into human worldviews and their effects on both degradation and restoration. *Plaster Creek (Grand Rapids, MI) is the "Ken-O-Sha" in the title. That Heffner and Warner choose to use the Ottawa name (translation, "Water of the Walleye") presages their centering of human history and cultural significance in its Indigenous roots. It also recognizes that the human-nature connection and relationship, which is associated with Indigenous worldviews, offers an alternative to the rigorous commodification and conquest attitudes of white settlers and, regrettably, most of their descendants. *The book is ostensibly an expansive report on the authors' efforts (with volunteers, students, and community members) to restore a degraded urban stream to better ecological health. It carefully examines the historic, cultural, ecological, and human contexts that led to the stream's degradation and how their team, Plaster Creek Stewards (PCS), navigates those contexts to restore the human-nature connections to enable the stream to recover. *Key to the restoration story has been the co-founding of the PCS group by Heffner and Warners. This group is an affiliation of watershed stakeholders, students, and volunteers who provide a collective energy and (literal) muscle for the restoration work. *Reconciliation in a Michigan Watershed is well written and good to read. It has thirteen chapters organized into three thematic sections: (1) recognizing the problem, (2) acknowledging our (settlers and descendants) complicity, and (3) committing to restoration. The treatment is rigorous in an academic sense with liberal (though unobtrusive) use of footnotes that link to a reasonably extensive bibliography spanning literature and poetry, news sources, and scientific journals. There is a table of contents and an index of topics to aid in orientation. *Reconciliation ... draws from scholarship in a wide variety of disciplines including geology, human history, ecology, sociology, policy, and even faith traditions. Indeed, this could have been simply a successful academic book, making all the interdisciplinary linkages by first explaining the degradation of Ken-O-Sha and then supporting its movement toward restoration within a philosophical frame of reconciliation. *The book is all that for certain, but what sets it apart is the truly tactile blending of personal stories (not only of the authors but also of volunteers and watershed residents) and a clear sense that the authors invested themselves in the restoration work and the people connected to it. There are stories of their apprehension and missteps in public engagement, of discovery or rediscovery of ecological richness and relic rare species, of a living memory of the good and bad. You read this and you know something intimate about the creek, something that can emerge only because the authors write from firsthand experience--mucking about, both literally and metaphorically, in the socio-ecological realities--and from an unspoken but clear love of the place. *I think this is a singularly important book. The term "reconciliation ecology" traces back to one of those interesting thought pieces found in academia. The sort of thing that one reads and maybe offers up as a discussion topic in a student seminar in which we sort through abstractions in a self-satisfying way. This, though, is an example of the idea put into emerging successful practice with all the granular detail about wins and losses, where the dirt under one's fingernails (again, real and metaphorical) is hard won. *Reconciliation ..., the book and the idea, is a next step in the authors' scholarship in re-considering the stewardship paradigm for Christian creation-care discipleship. Both authors were contributors to Beyond Stewardship (Calvin University Press, 2019), in which an interdisciplinary group of Christian scholars assembled to consider moving beyond the transactional/detached nature of the common stewardship paradigm (God wants me to care for creation so I must care for it) to a paradigm of interrelationship and communion between Creator and creation. It is easy to see the intellectual and spiritual connections between both books and how the authors' experience with PCS grounded their thinking. *It is telling and a little damning that Plaster Creek became "west Michigan's most contaminated waterway" in the very backyard of Calvin University, an institution that rightfully prides itself on rigorous Christian scholarship located in a city (Grand Rapids) closely identified with robust Reformed and Calvinist traditions. It speaks to a blind spot in expression of Christian faith and, likely, a pathology in worldview. Gail Gunst Heffner and David P. Warners make a wise and accurate diagnosis and offer the most promising treatment that I am aware of: reconnection. *It is a wise book and an important book. Highly recommended. *Reviewed by Timothy R. Van Deelen, Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,424
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,003
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,227
Écart entre enseignants0,220 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePerspectives on Science and Christian FaithMême sujetAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryTravaux en français237 207