A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PLASMA MICROBIAL CELL-FREE DNA AND DISEASE ACTIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH LUPUS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PT001 / #268 Topic: AS04 - Biomarkers POSTER TOUR 02: RECENT INSIGHTS ON THE PATHOGENESIS OF LUPUS NEPHRITIS 23-05-2025 10:00 AM - 10:40 AM Background/Purpose Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by widespread tissue inflammation and damage in association with antinuclear antibody production. Emerging research suggests that disturbances in the microbiome (dysbiosis) can interact with the immune system to drive pathogenesis. Microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) in plasma, analogous to human cell-free DNA, is thought to originate from microbial organisms undergoing cellular turnover. These microbial derived DNA fragments can transverse into the bloodstream and may be processed by circulating DNases. However, these degraded fragments may also be readily detected, identified, and quantified in plasma using advanced molecular and bioinformatics methodologies. The purpose of this pilot study was to explore a possible relationship between plasma mcfDNA and disease activity in patients with lupus. Methods Plasma samples from patients with lupus were collected at 2 clinical centers. Patients were clustered into 3 groups: complete remission, remission with a positive anti-dsDNA titre, and active disease (SLEDAI greater > 6) with a positive anti-dsDNA titre. Specimens from a healthy cohort were derived from an independent collection center. Plasma was collected, processed, and stored in K2-EDTA tubes. Cell-free DNA was extracted from plasma via the Karius Discovery assay and sequenced at a depth of 400M paired-end reads per sample. A set of analytical filters was applied to control for contamination, separating biological signals from background. Differential abundance analysis, correlation analysis, and principal coordinate analysis were conducted to identify microbial signatures that discriminated between the healthy and lupus patient populations as well as the disease activity groupings. Identified features were incorporated into a gradient-boosted machine learning classifier to assess their predictive power. Results Our study included 54 patients with SLE (median age 37.5 years, 46% had a history of lupus nephritis, 85% female) and 36 healthy controls (median age 45 years, 61% female). Our analysis indicated specific elevated microbial species, estimated in molecules per microliter (MPM), with concordant findings observed across both clinical centers. The mcfDNA that were identified were associated with the oral (Streptococcus, Prevotella, Porphyromonas, and Veillonella species); gastro-intestinal (Bacteroides, Alcaligenes, Streptomyces, and Campylobacter species); and skin (Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, and Acintobacter species) microbiomes (Figure 1). Principal coordinate analysis and preliminary machine learning classifiers suggested a possible partition between the healthy individuals and those with lupus (Figure 2). The analysis also indicated that a subset of the microbial signatures may differentiate between disease activity groupings. Figure 1. Figure 2. Conclusions Our pilot study provides preliminary data suggesting an increase in mcfDNA concentration from signature microbial species that can distinguish patients with SLE from controls and differentiate between disease subgroups. Further studies, including longitudinal analyses of larger and more diverse patient cohorts, will be needed to determine the utility of plasma mcfDNA as a biomarker for disease activity and delineate mechanisms by which increased mcfDNA may arise and contribute to pathogenesis.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».