MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PLASMA MICROBIAL CELL-FREE DNA AND DISEASE ACTIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH LUPUS

2025· article· en· W4410715680 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shiv D. Kale, Paul Babb, Roberto Caricchio, Amanda M. Eudy, David S. Pisetsky, Jennifer L Rogers, Sivan Bercovici

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSystemic lupus erythematosusLupus erythematosusDiseasePlasma cellImmunologyAutoimmune diseaseImmunopathologyConnective tissue diseaseDNAInternal medicineGeneticsAntibodyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PT001 / #268 Topic: AS04 - Biomarkers POSTER TOUR 02: RECENT INSIGHTS ON THE PATHOGENESIS OF LUPUS NEPHRITIS 23-05-2025 10:00 AM - 10:40 AM Background/Purpose Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by widespread tissue inflammation and damage in association with antinuclear antibody production. Emerging research suggests that disturbances in the microbiome (dysbiosis) can interact with the immune system to drive pathogenesis. Microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) in plasma, analogous to human cell-free DNA, is thought to originate from microbial organisms undergoing cellular turnover. These microbial derived DNA fragments can transverse into the bloodstream and may be processed by circulating DNases. However, these degraded fragments may also be readily detected, identified, and quantified in plasma using advanced molecular and bioinformatics methodologies. The purpose of this pilot study was to explore a possible relationship between plasma mcfDNA and disease activity in patients with lupus. Methods Plasma samples from patients with lupus were collected at 2 clinical centers. Patients were clustered into 3 groups: complete remission, remission with a positive anti-dsDNA titre, and active disease (SLEDAI greater > 6) with a positive anti-dsDNA titre. Specimens from a healthy cohort were derived from an independent collection center. Plasma was collected, processed, and stored in K2-EDTA tubes. Cell-free DNA was extracted from plasma via the Karius Discovery assay and sequenced at a depth of 400M paired-end reads per sample. A set of analytical filters was applied to control for contamination, separating biological signals from background. Differential abundance analysis, correlation analysis, and principal coordinate analysis were conducted to identify microbial signatures that discriminated between the healthy and lupus patient populations as well as the disease activity groupings. Identified features were incorporated into a gradient-boosted machine learning classifier to assess their predictive power. Results Our study included 54 patients with SLE (median age 37.5 years, 46% had a history of lupus nephritis, 85% female) and 36 healthy controls (median age 45 years, 61% female). Our analysis indicated specific elevated microbial species, estimated in molecules per microliter (MPM), with concordant findings observed across both clinical centers. The mcfDNA that were identified were associated with the oral (Streptococcus, Prevotella, Porphyromonas, and Veillonella species); gastro-intestinal (Bacteroides, Alcaligenes, Streptomyces, and Campylobacter species); and skin (Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, and Acintobacter species) microbiomes (Figure 1). Principal coordinate analysis and preliminary machine learning classifiers suggested a possible partition between the healthy individuals and those with lupus (Figure 2). The analysis also indicated that a subset of the microbial signatures may differentiate between disease activity groupings. Figure 1. Figure 2. Conclusions Our pilot study provides preliminary data suggesting an increase in mcfDNA concentration from signature microbial species that can distinguish patients with SLE from controls and differentiate between disease subgroups. Further studies, including longitudinal analyses of larger and more diverse patient cohorts, will be needed to determine the utility of plasma mcfDNA as a biomarker for disease activity and delineate mechanisms by which increased mcfDNA may arise and contribute to pathogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→French-language works237,207→