A simple workflow to identify novel Small Linear Motif (SLiM)-mediated interactions with AlphaFold
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Short linear motifs (SLiMs) are highly compact interaction modules embedded within disordered protein regions and are increasingly recognized for their central role in maintaining cellular homeostasis. Due to their small size, degeneracy and transient binding, SLiMs remain difficult to detect both experimentally and computationally. Here, we show that AlphaFold, used via ColabFold, offers a practical and accessible alternative for in-silico SLiM discovery. Unlike previous studies focused on structural accuracy, we evaluated AlphaFold’s capacity to reveal SLiMs independently of model quality. To this end, we benchmarked several scoring metrics and showed that AlphaFold2 combined with MiniPAE yields the best performance, outperforming AlphaFold3 in this context. Building on these findings, we also provide a streamlined and cost-effective workflow for SLiM prediction requiring no installation or local computation. To overcome challenges associated with SLiM validation, we also introduce a highly sensitive detection method based on proximity labeling in living cells. This workflow was used to predict the occurrence of SLiMs that mediate binding to ribosomal protein S6 kinase A3 (RPS6KA3 or RSK2). By leveraging Colabfold and MiniPAE available through Colab notebooks, our approach provides a scalable and widely accessible strategy for identifying functional SLiMs in proteins of interest. MiniPAE can be accessed at https://github.com/martinovein/MiniPAE Short description Martin Veinstein is a PhD student in Biomedical Sciences at the de Duve Institute, UCLouvain, Belgium. He specializes in Small Linear Motifs (SLiMs) in the context of host–virus interactions and has developed strong expertise in bioinformatics, structural biology, and predictive modeling. Victor J is a unfergradiate student at the ECAM Brussels Engineering School, Haute Ecole “ICHEC-ECAM-ISFSC”, Brussels, Belgium. His activities span form September to November 2023. B.I. Iorga is a CNRS Research Director at the Institut de Chimie des Substances Naturelles in Gif-sur-Yvette, France. His research focuses among others on methodological developments in molecular modeling and the in-silico prediction of antibiotic resistance using machine learning and deep learning approaches. Raphael Helaers is a Senior Investigator and leads bioinformatics infrastructure at the de Duve Institute, UCLouvain, Belgium. He has developed strong expertise in next-generation sequencing and software development, along with a deep interest in biology, genetics, and evolution. Thomas Michiels is a Full Professor and researcher at the de Duve Institute, UCLouvain, Belgium. His research focuses on virus-mediated subversion of the innate immune response. Frederic Sorgeloos is an adjunct Professor at the INRS, Laval, Canada. He currently focuses on the subversion of cellular homeostasis through small linear peptides encoded by viral and bacterial pathogens. Short abstract Various AlphaFold2/3 scoring metrics were systematically benchmarked for their ability to detect Small Linear Motifs (SLiMs) Based on this evaluation, a user-friendly and cost-effective in-silico workflow is proposed to identify novel SLiMs-targeting proteins The utility of this workflow is demonstrated through the prediction of previously uncharacterized SLiMs interacting with RSK kinases. A sensitive in-vitro assay is proposed to streamline the validation of low-affinity SLiM-target interactions. Together, our workflow and associated validation assay offer an integrated pipeline for the discovery and validation of SLiM-mediated protein-protein interactions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».