MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411159386 · doi:10.1101/2025.06.04.657817

A simple workflow to identify novel Small Linear Motif (SLiM)-mediated interactions with AlphaFold

2025· preprint· en· W4411159386 on OpenAlexaffabout
Martin Veinstein, Victor Janssens, Bogdan I. Iorga, Raphaël Helaers, Thomas Michiels, Frédéric Sorgeloos

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
KeywordsMotif (music)WorkflowSimple (philosophy)Computer scienceComputational biologyBiologyDatabasePhysicsEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Short linear motifs (SLiMs) are highly compact interaction modules embedded within disordered protein regions and are increasingly recognized for their central role in maintaining cellular homeostasis. Due to their small size, degeneracy and transient binding, SLiMs remain difficult to detect both experimentally and computationally. Here, we show that AlphaFold, used via ColabFold, offers a practical and accessible alternative for in-silico SLiM discovery. Unlike previous studies focused on structural accuracy, we evaluated AlphaFold’s capacity to reveal SLiMs independently of model quality. To this end, we benchmarked several scoring metrics and showed that AlphaFold2 combined with MiniPAE yields the best performance, outperforming AlphaFold3 in this context. Building on these findings, we also provide a streamlined and cost-effective workflow for SLiM prediction requiring no installation or local computation. To overcome challenges associated with SLiM validation, we also introduce a highly sensitive detection method based on proximity labeling in living cells. This workflow was used to predict the occurrence of SLiMs that mediate binding to ribosomal protein S6 kinase A3 (RPS6KA3 or RSK2). By leveraging Colabfold and MiniPAE available through Colab notebooks, our approach provides a scalable and widely accessible strategy for identifying functional SLiMs in proteins of interest. MiniPAE can be accessed at https://github.com/martinovein/MiniPAE Short description Martin Veinstein is a PhD student in Biomedical Sciences at the de Duve Institute, UCLouvain, Belgium. He specializes in Small Linear Motifs (SLiMs) in the context of host–virus interactions and has developed strong expertise in bioinformatics, structural biology, and predictive modeling. Victor J is a unfergradiate student at the ECAM Brussels Engineering School, Haute Ecole “ICHEC-ECAM-ISFSC”, Brussels, Belgium. His activities span form September to November 2023. B.I. Iorga is a CNRS Research Director at the Institut de Chimie des Substances Naturelles in Gif-sur-Yvette, France. His research focuses among others on methodological developments in molecular modeling and the in-silico prediction of antibiotic resistance using machine learning and deep learning approaches. Raphael Helaers is a Senior Investigator and leads bioinformatics infrastructure at the de Duve Institute, UCLouvain, Belgium. He has developed strong expertise in next-generation sequencing and software development, along with a deep interest in biology, genetics, and evolution. Thomas Michiels is a Full Professor and researcher at the de Duve Institute, UCLouvain, Belgium. His research focuses on virus-mediated subversion of the innate immune response. Frederic Sorgeloos is an adjunct Professor at the INRS, Laval, Canada. He currently focuses on the subversion of cellular homeostasis through small linear peptides encoded by viral and bacterial pathogens. Short abstract Various AlphaFold2/3 scoring metrics were systematically benchmarked for their ability to detect Small Linear Motifs (SLiMs) Based on this evaluation, a user-friendly and cost-effective in-silico workflow is proposed to identify novel SLiMs-targeting proteins The utility of this workflow is demonstrated through the prediction of previously uncharacterized SLiMs interacting with RSK kinases. A sensitive in-vitro assay is proposed to streamline the validation of low-affinity SLiM-target interactions. Together, our workflow and associated validation assay offer an integrated pipeline for the discovery and validation of SLiM-mediated protein-protein interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicComputational Drug Discovery Methods→French-language works237,207→