Multicenter clinical trial for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with a non-permanent orthodontic intraoral device in children
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a non-permanent orthodontic oral appliance intermittently worn in reducing the signs and symptoms of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A non-randomized interventional pre-post study was conducted in 2018–2021 with up to 24-month follow-up at five US and Canadian sites. Participants were 55 enrolled OSA-diagnosed children, fit with a customized device worn in the evening and while sleeping to provide slow maxillary expansion. Participants were assessed for treatment efficacy by three co-primary endpoints, the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ), apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), and intermolar width; and two secondary endpoints, the PSQ Sleep-Related Breathing Disorders (SRBD) subscale scores and airway volume by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Forty-seven participants were included in the analytic dataset following trial completion after 12–24 months. PSQ symptom scores decreased 31.0% with a posttreatment-pretreatment difference score mean±SE and 95% CI of −0.13 ± 0.019 [−0.17, −0.09]; AHI decreased 29.3% (−3.47±1.015 [−5.52, −1.42]). All participants showed an intermolar width increase, averaging 13.0% (4.03 ± 0.421 [3.18, 4.88]). PSQ SRBD subscale scores decreased 57.8% (−0.178 ± 0.031 [−0.24, −0.12]). Airway volume by CBCT scans increased 67.8% (4053.78 ± 885.433 mm 3 [2265.62, 5841.95]). There were no safety concerns. Conclusion : Participants showed objective and subjective OSA improvement, and all demonstrated maxillary expansion. Seventy-nine percent of participants showed AHI improvement, with 61.7% improving by 50% or more, and 17% resolved their OSA. Seventy-seven percent with moderate or severe OSA improved by 50%, while 93% with severe OSA achieved this milestone. This is the first study demonstrating that slow maxillary expansion by this device is safe and efficacious in treating children with OSA. Trial registration : ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05661747 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05661747 ) Registered: December 14, 2022, retrospectively registered. What Is Known: • Adenotonsillectomy is the primary treatment for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) but is invasive and has proximal and long-term risks. Secondary treatments include rapid maxillary expansion that has numerous adverse effects due to its 24/7 use and treatment speed, and positive airway pressure that is limited by patient intolerance and nonadherence. What Is New: • This oral appliance is the first one FDA cleared for OSA treatment in children, and this study showed that slow maxillary expansion by this device was safe and efficacious for treating pediatric OSA. It is also the only pediatric non-permanent orthodontic device that is removable and intermittently worn to treat OSA. Graphical Abstract
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».