MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411420470 · doi:10.1016/j.ard.2025.06.401

POS1047 CLINICAL AND ULTRASOUND FEATURES IN AN INCEPTION COHORT OF TREATMENT NAÏVE PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

2025· article· en· W4411420470 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Even Lillejordet, Nina Paulshus Sundlisæter, J. Sexton, Camilla Fongen, Ellen Moholt, M. K. A. Ljosa, Cathrine Austad, A. Slagsvold, Bjørg Tilde Svanes Fevang, Hongliang Yi, G. Bakland, Abha Gulati, Inger Myrnes Hansen, M. Dobel-Rynning, Mollie Braaten, A. Myhre Hjelle, D. van der Heijde, H.B. Hammer, Espen A. Haavardsholm, Siri Lillegraven

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePsoriatic arthritisCohortDermatologyUltrasoundInternal medicinePsoriasisRadiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Assessing a newly diagnosed patient with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) can be challenging, and the correct evaluation of clinical features may influence treatment decisions and prognosis. Current treatment recommendations underline this, as patients are stratified based on features such as enthesitis, predominant axial disease, or predominant skin and nail disease [1]. Ultrasound can be an important clinical tool to ensure correct treatment decisions from the onset of the disease. Objectives: To describe the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of treatment naïve PsA patients starting their first disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, including structured assessment of disease activity in joints, entheses, skin, and nails. Methods: Patients diagnosed with PsA who fulfilled the ClASsification for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria starting their first disease-modifying antirheumatic drug were included in an ongoing Norwegian multi-center study (NCT05291819). Patients underwent extensive clinical and ultrasound assessments. The clinical examination of joints included assessments of 66/68 swollen (SJC) and tender (TJC) joints and identification of dactylitis. The presence of enthesitis was evaluated clinically according to the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) and the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) enthesitis scoring system. Skin- and nail involvement was assessed by psoriasis body surface area (BSA), static Physician Global Assessment of Psoriasis (sPGA), and modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI). The Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) was used to assess the disease activity, and patient-reported outcomes were collected, such as patient global assessment of disease, pain, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). All patients underwent a comprehensive ultrasound protocol with evaluation of 74 joints, 20 tendons of the hands, and 14 entheses, all scored according to OMERACT definitions. Ultrasound inflammation was defined by power Doppler (PD) >0 in any joint, enthesis, flexor tendon sheath of the fingers, or within a peritenonitis proximal to the MCP joints. The grayscale (GS) sum score is comprised of joints, the flexor tendons of the hands, peritenonitis, and the inflammatory enthesis findings of hypoechogenicity and increased thickness. Results: A total of 111 consecutive patients were included in this analysis; 64% were male, and the mean (SD) age was 44.2 (14.0) years. 93% of the patients had a history of psoriasis, while in the remaining 7% it was present in a first-degree family member (Table 1). Physician-reported history of arthritis was the most prevalent disease feature, identified in 86% of patients. A history of axial involvement was documented in 29%, enthesitis in 30%, and nail psoriasis in 47% of patients. At the time of assessment, the median (IQR) SJC was 2 (1-4) and TJC 4 (2-8). Patient global assessment of disease activity visual analog scale (VAS) was 59 (41-70), VAS pain was 60 (40-70), and CRP 5 mg/L (2-11 mg/L), whereas the VAS physician global assessment of disease was 25 (15-40). 80% had a SJC>0. The baseline DAPSA had a median (IQR) value of 18.4 (12.5-28.3), corresponding to moderate disease activity. The skin disease among the patients was mild. Although 87% had any psoriasis plaque, the median (IQR) BSA was 2% (1-4%), sPGA score 3 (2-4), and mNAPSI score 1 (0-8). The median ultrasound GS sum score was 11 (5-22) (Table 2). When focusing solely on the GS score for joints, a GS >1 was observed in 75% of patients. The median PD sum score was 3 (0-7), with 69% having a value >0 in any of the ultrasound-examined structures. 52% had any joint with PD>0. A PD-signal >0 was observed in an enthesis in 35% of the patients, with the lateral epicondyle being the most commonly affected enthesis (12%), followed by the proximal patellar tendon insertion (11%). Additionally, peritenonitis was identified in 19%, and flexor tenosynovitis in 21%. Conclusion: In this treatment naïve early PsA inception cohort with an aim to include all PsA patients starting DMARD treatment, extensive examinations illustrated the heterogeneous nature of the disease. After skin psoriasis, arthritis was the feature affecting most patients, with clinically swollen joints in 80% and ultrasound PD joint synovitis in 52%. Other aspects of PsA, such as a clinical finding of dactylitis and ultrasound findings of enthesitis, tenosynovitis, and peritenonitis, each had an overall prevalence of at least 20%, reflecting the diversity of this patient population. Ultrasound might add useful information about inflammation in a number of structures. In conclusion, extensive examination of affected structures is necessary to guide treatment decisions in early PsA. REFERENCES: [1] Gossec L, Kerschbaumer A, Ferreira RJO, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2023 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024; 83:706-19. Acknowledgements: NIL . Disclosure of Interests: Even Lillejordet: None declared, Nina Sundlisæter: None declared, Joseph Sexton: None declared, Camilla Fongen: None declared, Ellen Moholt: None declared, Maud-Kristine A Ljosa Advisory board: Abbvie, Cathrine Austad: None declared, Annicken Slagsvold: None declared, Bjørg Tilde Svanes Fevang: None declared, Hu Yi Speaker fee: Boehringer Ingelheim, Gunnstein Bakland Speaker fee: Johnson&Johnson, Agnete Gulati: None declared, Inger M. Hansen: None declared, Martyna Dobel-Rynning: None declared, Mathias Møgster Braaten: None declared, Anja Myhre Hjelle: None declared, Désirée van der Heijde Consulting fees: AbbVie, Alfasigma, ArgenX, BMS, Lilly, Grey-Wolf Therapeutics, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, UCB Pharma, Hilde Berner Hammer Speaker fees: AbbVie, UCB, Novartis, Lilly, Espen Haavardsholm Advisory board: Pfizer, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Siri Lillegraven: None declared. © The Authors 2025. This abstract is an open access article published in Annals of Rheumatic Diseases under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Neither EULAR nor the publisher make any representation as to the accuracy of the content. The authors are solely responsible for the content in their abstract including accuracy of the facts, statements, results, conclusion, citing resources etc.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,013

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,330
Écart entre enseignants0,312 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases→Même sujetSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→