MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411420470 · doi:10.1016/j.ard.2025.06.401

POS1047 CLINICAL AND ULTRASOUND FEATURES IN AN INCEPTION COHORT OF TREATMENT NAÏVE PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

2025· article· en· W4411420470 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Even Lillejordet, Nina Paulshus Sundlisæter, J. Sexton, Camilla Fongen, Ellen Moholt, M. K. A. Ljosa, Cathrine Austad, A. Slagsvold, Bjørg Tilde Svanes Fevang, Hongliang Yi, G. Bakland, Abha Gulati, Inger Myrnes Hansen, M. Dobel-Rynning, Mollie Braaten, A. Myhre Hjelle, D. van der Heijde, H.B. Hammer, Espen A. Haavardsholm, Siri Lillegraven

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePsoriatic arthritisCohortDermatologyUltrasoundInternal medicinePsoriasisRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Assessing a newly diagnosed patient with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) can be challenging, and the correct evaluation of clinical features may influence treatment decisions and prognosis. Current treatment recommendations underline this, as patients are stratified based on features such as enthesitis, predominant axial disease, or predominant skin and nail disease [1]. Ultrasound can be an important clinical tool to ensure correct treatment decisions from the onset of the disease. Objectives: To describe the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of treatment naïve PsA patients starting their first disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, including structured assessment of disease activity in joints, entheses, skin, and nails. Methods: Patients diagnosed with PsA who fulfilled the ClASsification for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria starting their first disease-modifying antirheumatic drug were included in an ongoing Norwegian multi-center study (NCT05291819). Patients underwent extensive clinical and ultrasound assessments. The clinical examination of joints included assessments of 66/68 swollen (SJC) and tender (TJC) joints and identification of dactylitis. The presence of enthesitis was evaluated clinically according to the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) and the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) enthesitis scoring system. Skin- and nail involvement was assessed by psoriasis body surface area (BSA), static Physician Global Assessment of Psoriasis (sPGA), and modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI). The Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) was used to assess the disease activity, and patient-reported outcomes were collected, such as patient global assessment of disease, pain, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). All patients underwent a comprehensive ultrasound protocol with evaluation of 74 joints, 20 tendons of the hands, and 14 entheses, all scored according to OMERACT definitions. Ultrasound inflammation was defined by power Doppler (PD) >0 in any joint, enthesis, flexor tendon sheath of the fingers, or within a peritenonitis proximal to the MCP joints. The grayscale (GS) sum score is comprised of joints, the flexor tendons of the hands, peritenonitis, and the inflammatory enthesis findings of hypoechogenicity and increased thickness. Results: A total of 111 consecutive patients were included in this analysis; 64% were male, and the mean (SD) age was 44.2 (14.0) years. 93% of the patients had a history of psoriasis, while in the remaining 7% it was present in a first-degree family member (Table 1). Physician-reported history of arthritis was the most prevalent disease feature, identified in 86% of patients. A history of axial involvement was documented in 29%, enthesitis in 30%, and nail psoriasis in 47% of patients. At the time of assessment, the median (IQR) SJC was 2 (1-4) and TJC 4 (2-8). Patient global assessment of disease activity visual analog scale (VAS) was 59 (41-70), VAS pain was 60 (40-70), and CRP 5 mg/L (2-11 mg/L), whereas the VAS physician global assessment of disease was 25 (15-40). 80% had a SJC>0. The baseline DAPSA had a median (IQR) value of 18.4 (12.5-28.3), corresponding to moderate disease activity. The skin disease among the patients was mild. Although 87% had any psoriasis plaque, the median (IQR) BSA was 2% (1-4%), sPGA score 3 (2-4), and mNAPSI score 1 (0-8). The median ultrasound GS sum score was 11 (5-22) (Table 2). When focusing solely on the GS score for joints, a GS >1 was observed in 75% of patients. The median PD sum score was 3 (0-7), with 69% having a value >0 in any of the ultrasound-examined structures. 52% had any joint with PD>0. A PD-signal >0 was observed in an enthesis in 35% of the patients, with the lateral epicondyle being the most commonly affected enthesis (12%), followed by the proximal patellar tendon insertion (11%). Additionally, peritenonitis was identified in 19%, and flexor tenosynovitis in 21%. Conclusion: In this treatment naïve early PsA inception cohort with an aim to include all PsA patients starting DMARD treatment, extensive examinations illustrated the heterogeneous nature of the disease. After skin psoriasis, arthritis was the feature affecting most patients, with clinically swollen joints in 80% and ultrasound PD joint synovitis in 52%. Other aspects of PsA, such as a clinical finding of dactylitis and ultrasound findings of enthesitis, tenosynovitis, and peritenonitis, each had an overall prevalence of at least 20%, reflecting the diversity of this patient population. Ultrasound might add useful information about inflammation in a number of structures. In conclusion, extensive examination of affected structures is necessary to guide treatment decisions in early PsA. REFERENCES: [1] Gossec L, Kerschbaumer A, Ferreira RJO, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2023 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024; 83:706-19. Acknowledgements: NIL . Disclosure of Interests: Even Lillejordet: None declared, Nina Sundlisæter: None declared, Joseph Sexton: None declared, Camilla Fongen: None declared, Ellen Moholt: None declared, Maud-Kristine A Ljosa Advisory board: Abbvie, Cathrine Austad: None declared, Annicken Slagsvold: None declared, Bjørg Tilde Svanes Fevang: None declared, Hu Yi Speaker fee: Boehringer Ingelheim, Gunnstein Bakland Speaker fee: Johnson&Johnson, Agnete Gulati: None declared, Inger M. Hansen: None declared, Martyna Dobel-Rynning: None declared, Mathias Møgster Braaten: None declared, Anja Myhre Hjelle: None declared, Désirée van der Heijde Consulting fees: AbbVie, Alfasigma, ArgenX, BMS, Lilly, Grey-Wolf Therapeutics, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, UCB Pharma, Hilde Berner Hammer Speaker fees: AbbVie, UCB, Novartis, Lilly, Espen Haavardsholm Advisory board: Pfizer, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Siri Lillegraven: None declared. © The Authors 2025. This abstract is an open access article published in Annals of Rheumatic Diseases under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Neither EULAR nor the publisher make any representation as to the accuracy of the content. The authors are solely responsible for the content in their abstract including accuracy of the facts, statements, results, conclusion, citing resources etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases→Same topicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments→French-language works237,207→