MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411433001 · doi:10.1016/j.ard.2025.05.402

POS0005 Inhaled Pirfenidone as an innovative therapeutic approach to treat autoimmune ILD and other forms of Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis: Phase 2b Study Design

2025· article· en· W4411433001 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Oliver Distler, Colin Reisner, S. Tilleux, Allison Trucillo, Deepthi Nair, Felix Woodhead, Hillard M. Lazarus, Craig Conoscenti, Martin Kolb

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePirfenidonePulmonary fibrosisIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosisFibrosisImmunologyIntensive care medicineInternal medicineLung

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis (PPF) is an increasingly recognized condition, defined in 2022 to address the progression of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). PPF is a characteristic feature of autoimmune ILD. Oral pirfenidone has shown positive signals in some studies without reaching primary endpoint, but treatment with oral pirfenidone is also associated with significant adverse events and a poor tolerability profile. This study aims at exploring the efficacy and safety of inhaled pirfenidone which might be a promising therapeutic approach considering the local drug delivery into the lungs and the subsequent reduced systemic exposure. Objectives: Data from the AP01-002 (ATLAS) Study of inhaled pirfenidone in IPF demonstrated efficacy and improved safety compared to that seen with oral pirfenidone [1]. The AP01-005 long term extension study allowed new patients with PPF to enter the study and showed a trend to FVC stabilization. The AP01-007 (MIST Study) is designed to study the efficacy and safety of AP01 (inhaled pirfenidone) in patients with PPF including autoimmune ILD patients. Patients will remain on stable background immunosuppression and up to 30% of patients will remain on background nintedanib therapy. Methods: MIST is a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial comparing two doses (100mg BID and 50mg BID) of inhaled pirfenidone with placebo over 52 weeks. The primary endpoint is the change in the annual rate of decline in FVC in the AP01 treatment groups as compared to placebo. In addition, efficacy will be measured in secondary endpoints of time to progression, change in fibrotic scores via quantitative HRCT, and change from baseline QoL. Safety outcomes will be assessed as well. Cough will be analyzed through cough counts and cough questionnaires, which should allow differentiation of cough related to PPF vs. the inhalation procedure. Patients will be eligible if they meet at least one of the following criteria for progression of ILD within the 24 months prior to screening: a relative decline in the FVC of at least 10% of the predicted value, a relative decline in the FVC of ≥5% to less than 10% of the predicted value accompanied by worsening of respiratory symptoms or an increased extent of fibrosis on HRCT; or worsening of respiratory symptoms and an increased extent of fibrosis on HRCT. 300 patients will be recruited in 14 countries, including Europe. Results: Results of this study will not be available at this time. The primary endpoint is the change from baseline in forced vital capacity (FVC) (mL) at Week 52. Secondary endpoints include absolute change from baseline in QoL measurements as assessed by Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire (L-PF) total score at Week 52, time to disease progression (disease progression is defined as absolute FVC percent predicted decline of ≥10% prior to Week 52), and change in lung fibrosis score based on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) from Baseline to 52 weeks. Conclusion: MIST is the first study to analyze the novel concept of inhaled medications in autoimmune ILD. Safety and efficacy of AP01 in patients with PPF will be studied. In addition to the safety and efficacy endpoints, MIST will examine the presence of cough in this population of patients. REFERENCES: [1] West A, Chaudhuri N, Barczyk A, et al. Inhaled pirfenidone solution (AP01) for IPF: a randomized, open-label, dose-response trial. Thorax. Sep 2023;78(9):882-889. doi:10.1136/thorax-2022-219391 Acknowledgements: NIL . Disclosure of Interests: Oliver Distler has had consultancy relationship with and/or has served as a speaker for the following companies in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis/fibrosis and its complications in the last three calendar years: 4P-Pharma, Abbvie, Acceleron, Acepodia Biotech, Aera, Alcimed, Altavant, Amgen, AnaMar, Anaveon AG, Argenx, AstraZeneca, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Calluna (Arxx), Cantargia AB, Catalyze Capital, Corbus, CSL Behring, Galderma, Galapagos, Glenmark, Gossamer, Horizon, Janssen, Kymera, Lupin, Medscape, MSD Merck, Miltenyi Biotec, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Nkarta Inc., Novartis, Orion, Pilan, Prometheus, Quell, Redxpharma, Roivant, EMD Serono, Topadur and UCB, Patent issued "mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis" (US8247389, EP2331143), is a Co-founder of CITUS AG, Research Grants from BI, Kymera, Mitsubishi Tanabe, UCB, Colin Reisner is an employee of Devpro Biopharma, Sébastien Tilleux is an employee of Avalyn pharma Inc, Allison Trucillo is an employee of Avalyn Pharma Inc, Deepthi Nair is an employee of Avalyn Pharma Inc, Felix Woodhead is an employee of Avalyn Pharma Inc, Howard M. Lazarus is an employee of Avalyn Pharma Inc, Craig Conoscenti is an employee of Avalyn Pharma Inc, Martin Kolb has received fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, European Respiratory Journal, Fortrea, United Therapeutics, Abbvie, Avalyn, DevPro Biopharma, Horizon/Amgen, CSL Behring, AZ, GSK, Sanofi, Structure Therapeutics and Glenmark, grants from the Canadian Institute for Health Research, Boehringer Ingelheim, United Therapeutics, Structure Therapeutics. © The Authors 2025. This abstract is an open access article published in Annals of Rheumatic Diseases under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Neither EULAR nor the publisher make any representation as to the accuracy of the content. The authors are solely responsible for the content in their abstract including accuracy of the facts, statements, results, conclusion, citing resources etc.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Protocole · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,038

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,002
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,357
Écart entre enseignants0,314 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreProtocole

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases→Même sujetInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis→Travaux en français237 207→