MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411448755 · doi:10.1097/corr.0000000000003482

High Risk of Venous Thromboembolism With Aspirin Prophylaxis After THA for High-riding Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Retrospective, Comparative Study

2025· article· en· W4411448755 sur OpenAlexaff
Kaveh Gharanizadeh, Hadi Ravanbod, Mohammad Poursalehian, Amir Aminian, Maziar Rajei, Mohammad Hassanzadeh, Mansour Abolghasemian

Notice bibliographique

RevueClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHip disorders and treatments
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAspirinPulmonary embolismDeep veinRetrospective cohort studySurgeryVenous thromboembolismThrombosisVenous thrombosisArthroplastyInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Despite advancements, THA is still associated with risks, particularly venous thromboembolism (VTE). THA in patients with high-riding developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) could potentially be associated with an elevated risk of VTE. We conducted a study to evaluate whether patients with high-riding DDH undergoing THA and receiving aspirin have an increased risk of symptomatic VTE compared with patients undergoing primary THA for other diagnoses. Additionally, we investigated possible risk factors for VTE within this specific patient group. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is the risk of symptomatic VTE (all deep vein thrombosis [DVT] plus pulmonary embolism, or proximal DVT plus pulmonary embolism) increased in patients undergoing THA for severe DDH, defined as Crowe type III or IV, compared with patients undergoing THA for other reasons when aspirin is used for prophylaxis? (2) In patients with severe DDH undergoing THA, are there specific identifiable risk factors associated with an increased risk of symptomatic VTE? METHODS: Between June and November 2021, an arthroplasty surgeon performed 153 consecutive primary THAs on 146 patients across two arthroplasty centers. All patients except those with a history of prior VTE or those on chronic anticoagulation received aspirin as pharmacologic prophylaxis for VTE. No routine surveillance for VTE was used. To be eligible for this retrospective comparative study, a chart note documenting any signs or symptoms of symptomatic VTE had to be present at least 3 months postoperatively. Patients were excluded for the following reasons: they had a personal history of VTE (1% [2 of 146]), they were receiving ongoing anticoagulant therapy (2% [3 of 146]), they were out of the age criteria range (2% [3 of 146]), they had undergone same-setting bilateral THAs or the second side of staged bilateral THAs (3% [4 of 146]), or they were lost to follow-up within 90 days after surgery (0% [0]). After exclusions, 134 patients (134 hips) remained. Patients were divided into two groups based on their preoperative diagnosis: (1) high-riding DDH of Crowe type III or IV (35% [47 of 134] of hips) and (2) all other diagnoses, including primary or inflammatory arthritis, Crowe type I or II DDH, fracture, and osteonecrosis (65% [87 of 134] of hips). A comprehensive records review was conducted to determine the incidence of symptomatic VTE, including distal DVT, proximal DVT, or pulmonary embolism. Patients' demographics, surgical details, and outcomes were compared between the groups. The high-riding group had longer operations and a higher percentage of patients having general anesthesia, acetabular bone grafting, transfusions, or restricted weightbearing postoperatively. Univariable analysis was performed to compare the high-riding DDH group with the control group and to evaluate associations between potential risk factors and symptomatic VTE. Subsequently, multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify independent risk factors among the variables identified in the univariable analysis. RESULTS: Patients undergoing THA for DDH had higher odds of experiencing symptomatic VTE compared with the control group (17% [8 of 47] versus 1% [1 of 87], OR 18 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2 to 146]; p = 0.001). After adjusting for confounding variables such as age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists grading, anesthesia type, operation duration, shortening osteotomy, shelf/impaction grafting, and blood transfusion, patients undergoing THA for high-riding DDH still had higher adjusted odds of symptomatic VTE compared with the other group (adjusted OR 67 [95% CI 3 to 151]; p = 0.008). When considering only proximal DVT or pulmonary embolism events (excluding distal DVT), the odds of experiencing a VTE event remained higher in patients with high-riding DDH compared with the other group (11% [5 of 47] versus 1% [1 of 87], OR 10 [95% CI 1 to 90]; p = 0.02). In patients undergoing THA for high-riding DDH, after controlling for potential confounding variables, limb lengthening was identified as the only factor associated with an increased likelihood of symptomatic VTE (median [range] lengthening 38 mm [25 to 60] versus 25 mm [15 to 50]; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Our findings showed that patients undergoing THA for high-riding developmental DDH and receiving aspirin for VTE prophylaxis had a higher likelihood of experiencing symptomatic VTE, including DVT and pulmonary embolism, compared with patients undergoing primary THA for other indications. Additionally, greater intraoperative limb lengthening in this group appeared to further increase the risk of VTE. While DDH may be a risk factor for symptomatic VTE after THA, this association could also be attributed to the increased complexity of the procedure in hips with high-riding DDH. Until larger studies with multivariable analyses of potential risk factors are conducted to clarify this issue, we recommend that surgeons consider using thromboprophylaxis agents more potent than aspirin for patients undergoing THA for high-riding DDH and remain particularly vigilant in the postoperative period for signs and symptoms of VTE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,046
Tête enseignante GPT0,392
Écart entre enseignants0,346 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueClinical Orthopaedics and Related ResearchMême sujetHip disorders and treatmentsTravaux en français237 207