MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411448755 · doi:10.1097/corr.0000000000003482

High Risk of Venous Thromboembolism With Aspirin Prophylaxis After THA for High-riding Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Retrospective, Comparative Study

2025· article· en· W4411448755 on OpenAlexaff
Kaveh Gharanizadeh, Hadi Ravanbod, Mohammad Poursalehian, Amir Aminian, Maziar Rajei, Mohammad Hassanzadeh, Mansour Abolghasemian

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAspirinPulmonary embolismDeep veinRetrospective cohort studySurgeryVenous thromboembolismThrombosisVenous thrombosisArthroplastyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Despite advancements, THA is still associated with risks, particularly venous thromboembolism (VTE). THA in patients with high-riding developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) could potentially be associated with an elevated risk of VTE. We conducted a study to evaluate whether patients with high-riding DDH undergoing THA and receiving aspirin have an increased risk of symptomatic VTE compared with patients undergoing primary THA for other diagnoses. Additionally, we investigated possible risk factors for VTE within this specific patient group. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is the risk of symptomatic VTE (all deep vein thrombosis [DVT] plus pulmonary embolism, or proximal DVT plus pulmonary embolism) increased in patients undergoing THA for severe DDH, defined as Crowe type III or IV, compared with patients undergoing THA for other reasons when aspirin is used for prophylaxis? (2) In patients with severe DDH undergoing THA, are there specific identifiable risk factors associated with an increased risk of symptomatic VTE? METHODS: Between June and November 2021, an arthroplasty surgeon performed 153 consecutive primary THAs on 146 patients across two arthroplasty centers. All patients except those with a history of prior VTE or those on chronic anticoagulation received aspirin as pharmacologic prophylaxis for VTE. No routine surveillance for VTE was used. To be eligible for this retrospective comparative study, a chart note documenting any signs or symptoms of symptomatic VTE had to be present at least 3 months postoperatively. Patients were excluded for the following reasons: they had a personal history of VTE (1% [2 of 146]), they were receiving ongoing anticoagulant therapy (2% [3 of 146]), they were out of the age criteria range (2% [3 of 146]), they had undergone same-setting bilateral THAs or the second side of staged bilateral THAs (3% [4 of 146]), or they were lost to follow-up within 90 days after surgery (0% [0]). After exclusions, 134 patients (134 hips) remained. Patients were divided into two groups based on their preoperative diagnosis: (1) high-riding DDH of Crowe type III or IV (35% [47 of 134] of hips) and (2) all other diagnoses, including primary or inflammatory arthritis, Crowe type I or II DDH, fracture, and osteonecrosis (65% [87 of 134] of hips). A comprehensive records review was conducted to determine the incidence of symptomatic VTE, including distal DVT, proximal DVT, or pulmonary embolism. Patients' demographics, surgical details, and outcomes were compared between the groups. The high-riding group had longer operations and a higher percentage of patients having general anesthesia, acetabular bone grafting, transfusions, or restricted weightbearing postoperatively. Univariable analysis was performed to compare the high-riding DDH group with the control group and to evaluate associations between potential risk factors and symptomatic VTE. Subsequently, multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify independent risk factors among the variables identified in the univariable analysis. RESULTS: Patients undergoing THA for DDH had higher odds of experiencing symptomatic VTE compared with the control group (17% [8 of 47] versus 1% [1 of 87], OR 18 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2 to 146]; p = 0.001). After adjusting for confounding variables such as age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists grading, anesthesia type, operation duration, shortening osteotomy, shelf/impaction grafting, and blood transfusion, patients undergoing THA for high-riding DDH still had higher adjusted odds of symptomatic VTE compared with the other group (adjusted OR 67 [95% CI 3 to 151]; p = 0.008). When considering only proximal DVT or pulmonary embolism events (excluding distal DVT), the odds of experiencing a VTE event remained higher in patients with high-riding DDH compared with the other group (11% [5 of 47] versus 1% [1 of 87], OR 10 [95% CI 1 to 90]; p = 0.02). In patients undergoing THA for high-riding DDH, after controlling for potential confounding variables, limb lengthening was identified as the only factor associated with an increased likelihood of symptomatic VTE (median [range] lengthening 38 mm [25 to 60] versus 25 mm [15 to 50]; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Our findings showed that patients undergoing THA for high-riding developmental DDH and receiving aspirin for VTE prophylaxis had a higher likelihood of experiencing symptomatic VTE, including DVT and pulmonary embolism, compared with patients undergoing primary THA for other indications. Additionally, greater intraoperative limb lengthening in this group appeared to further increase the risk of VTE. While DDH may be a risk factor for symptomatic VTE after THA, this association could also be attributed to the increased complexity of the procedure in hips with high-riding DDH. Until larger studies with multivariable analyses of potential risk factors are conducted to clarify this issue, we recommend that surgeons consider using thromboprophylaxis agents more potent than aspirin for patients undergoing THA for high-riding DDH and remain particularly vigilant in the postoperative period for signs and symptoms of VTE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Orthopaedics and Related ResearchSame topicHip disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207