The CEHS Presidential Roundtable. Volksdeutsche Beyond German History: Re-Centering “German” Communities in Central Europe and the Americas
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
region shows their complicated relationship with each other and with their Romanian and Ukrainian neighbors, and also how German historiography to this day siloes these experiences into national history, "scientific" research, and popular culture.Mirna Zakić provides perspectives on how Volksdeutsche negotiated their Germanness with Serbs and others in the multiethnic Vojvodina in Serbia, and why much of this history was elided in postwar historiographies.The forum is moderated by Winson Chu, who served as CEHS president in 2024-25 and works on German and Polish history.With a critical examination of the concept of Volksdeutsche, the forum examines German minority communities on two levels: 1) how the historical actors could use Germanness as a resource or see it as a liability; and 2) how historians grapple with the pitfalls in understanding and narrating this history through the lens of "ethnic German."The participants also uncover issues related to national indifference, wartime collaboration, immigration, gender, and diasporas.The forum follows the challenges of writing transatlantic and transnational history, how increasingly authoritarian regimes can threaten this scholarship, and how foreign language learning can impact future research.The lively discussion that followed the roundtable had to be cut short, but many of the impulses and insights are reproduced in the conversation here.To get things started, tell us a little bit about your own research on Volksdeutsche and where you think trends are going. Doris BergenThe invitation to be part of this discussion was especially welcome for me, because I'm returning to a project I began in the 1980s (!), that I call "Defining Germanness during the Holocaust."Back when I was a graduate student researching the German Christian Movement, I discovered that those militantly pro-Nazi Protestants had an outpost in Romania.Researching its leading figure, Wilhelm Staedel, got me interested in the Volksdeutschen, specifically their connections to religion.In the 1990s, I jumped on new possibilities to visit archives and sites in Poland, Russia, and Ukraine, and I used my findings to write a series of articles and book chapters.Later I was part of a related project on European Mennonites and the Holocaust, led by Mark Jantzen and John Thiesen (now a volume published by University of Toronto Press). 2 Now, as I try to chart my course through the mountains of material I've gathered, I have some observations to share.One point is just about the expansion of scholarship since the late 1980s.In fact, there was actually quite a bit written about the Volksdeutschen of eastern Europe even then, but with a few exceptions, it fell into two categories: a small but intense body of studies produced in what was then known as the East Bloc, depicting ethnic Germans as "fifth columnists" of Hitlerite fascism, and a much larger body of apologetic work produced in the West-in West Germany and also in German diaspora communities-that depicted, often in minute detail, the suffering of the German expellees.Now we have works that are nuanced and integrative, including publications by all of you, as well as Isabel Heinemann, Valdis Lumans, Gerhard Wolf, Eric Steinhart, Tara Zahra, Hugo Service, David Furber, Bradley Nichols, and others.I want to draw attention to a recent and especially significant contribution, and that's the two-volume work by Alexa Stiller, Völkische Politik: Praktiken der Exklusion und Inklusion in polnischen, französischen und slowenischen Annexionsgebieten 1939Annexionsgebieten -1945.3 .3 Stiller's work is both
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,054 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».