Guselkumab for Moderate to Severe Scalp Psoriasis Across All Skin Tones
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Importance: Varying hair textures and hair care practices contribute to nuances in clinical presentation and management of scalp psoriasis across diverse patient populations. Cohort B of the VISIBLE trial enrolled participants with moderate to severe scalp psoriasis and skin of color, across the skin-tone spectrum. Objective: To evaluate efficacy, quality of life, and adverse event outcomes of guselkumab, 100 mg, among participants with moderate to severe scalp psoriasis and skin of color over 48 weeks. Design, Setting, and Participants: This ongoing phase 3b, randomized clinical trial at 45 sites in the US and Canada enrolled adults with skin of color and moderate to severe scalp psoriasis (scalp surface area [SSA] ≥30%; Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index [PSSI] ≥12; scalp-specific Investigator's Global Assessment [ss-IGA] score ≥3; ≥1 nonscalp plaque). Data were collected from September 2022 to June 2024. Interventions: Randomized participants (3:1) received guselkumab, 100 mg, at weeks 0, 4, and every 8 weeks, or placebo at weeks 0, 4, and 12, then guselkumab at weeks 16, 20, and every 8 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Coprimary end points were ss-IGA score of 0 or 1 (ss-IGA 0/1) and 90% or greater improvement in PSSI (PSSI 90) at week 16 (guselkumab vs placebo). Major secondary end points included ss-IGA 0 (complete scalp clearance), PSSI 100, percentage changes from baseline in PSSI and SSA, changes from baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) symptoms score, and 4-point or greater reduction in Scalp Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score. Results: Of 108 participants (81 randomized to guselkumab; 27 randomized to placebo), 100 (92.6%) completed 48 weeks of treatment. The mean (SD) age overall was 42.5 (13.6) years, and 58 participants (56.9%) were male. At the week 16 primary end point, in the guselkumab (n = 76) vs placebo (n = 26) groups, respectively, response rates were as follows: ss-IGA 0/1, 68.4% (n = 52) vs 11.5% (n = 3) (P < .001); PSSI 90, 65.8% (n = 50) vs 3.8% (n = 1) (P < .001); ss-IGA 0, 57.9% (n = 44) vs 3.8% (n = 1) (P < .001); PSSI 100, 59.2% (n = 45) vs 3.8% (n = 1) (P < .001); 4-point or greater reduction in Scalp Itch NRS score (in those with a baseline score of at least 4), 69.4% (n = 50 of 72) vs 24.0% (n = 6 of 25) (P < .001). Guselkumab efficacy increased and was maintained through week 48, when guselkumab-randomized participants achieved mean (SD) percentage improvements in PSSI and SSA of 94.6% (12.2%) and 94.8% (16.2%), respectively, and 51 (67.1%) achieved ss-IGA 0. DLQI and PSSD symptoms score least-squares mean changes were -9.7 (95% CI, -11.1 to -8.2) vs -2.2 (95% CI, -4.8 to 0.4) (P < .001) and -44.8 (95% CI, -50.6 to -39.1) vs -8.3 (95% CI, -18.4 to 1.9) (P < .001), respectively, with sustained improvements through week 48. Through week 16, infections were the most common adverse events in the guselkumab (n = 12; 14.8%) and placebo (n = 1; 3.7%) groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, after 3 doses of guselkumab, most participants achieved significant scalp clearance and clinically meaningful quality-of-life improvements; improvements increased and were maintained through week 48. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05272150.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».