University students’ anticipated stigma toward individuals with hereditary chronic diseases in oman: a cross-sectional study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Stigma is an experienced or anticipated social practice or negative labeling described as the blame or rejection of a person or group of people. Chronic diseases such as HIV/AIDS could result in stigma and contribute to negative health outcomes. An individual with chronic disease may experience public stigma from family members, coworkers, friends, or healthcare staff, especially those with hereditary diseases. There are few published articles concerning hereditary chronic diseases that recognize this issue in Oman. This study aims to assess university students' anticipated stigma toward individuals with hereditary chronic diseases. Stigma is defined as negative labeling described as the blame or rejection of a person or group of people. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed at a higher education institution aged 18-30 years via a self-administered questionnaire. The study assessed university students' anticipated stigma toward individuals with hereditary chronic diseases using the Chronic Illness Anticipated Stigma Scale (CIASS), which has been adapted in this context to explore attitudes in a non-patient population A total of 407 students completed the survey. The majority (93.9%) of respondents were male, and 42.5% were 21 to 24 years of age. RESULTS: The main findings of this study are that the anticipated stigma is high towards chronic hereditary diseases and Coworkers and employers were found to stigmatize patients with the chronic disease more than health care providers, family members, and friends. The majority (63.1%) of participants anticipated stigma with hereditary chronic diseases. Those who do not suffer from hereditary chronic diseases have a higher anticipated stigma than those who do suffer from hereditary chronic diseases. The highest mean scores were in the category of coworkers and employers (M = 9.55 ± 2.994), followed by the health care providers (M = 9.15 ± 3.433). The lowest scores were for family and friends (M = 8.46 ± 2.935). Students who did not suffer from hereditary chronic diseases (F (1,404) = 4.328, p =.038), students who were unaware of the premarital screening (PMS) (F (2,402) = 3.385, p =.035), and those who were unwilling to undergo PMS (F (1,405) = 9.342, p =.002) showed higher stigma scores. CONCLUSIONS: Providing supportive help for individuals with hereditary chronic illnesses is imperative and needs to be incorporated within their plan of care. Further studies are needed to investigate all these factors and how they are related to the stigma of chronic diseases.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».