MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411921002 · doi:10.4103/jasi.jasi_102_25

The Anatomical Basis of Cerebral Stroke: Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Detection and Diagnosis

2025· article· en· W4411921002 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vishram Singh, Krishna Chaitanya Reddy, Rashi Singh, Gaurav Singh

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Anatomical Society of India · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBasis (linear algebra)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceStroke (engine)MedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationNeurosciencePsychologyEngineeringMathematics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction A stroke, also known as a cerebral stroke, is a medical condition in which blood supply to the brain is interrupted or blocked, leading to its cell death. This can lead to long-term disabilities and even death. Cerebral stroke remains a leading cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide, affecting approximately 15 million people annually and representing a critical public health challenge.[1] Immediate intervention is critical, as delays in treatment exacerbate neuronal loss and worsen clinical outcomes.[2] Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have revolutionized stroke care by enabling rapid, precise anatomical analysis of cerebrovascular pathology, from vascular occlusion patterns to penumbral viability.[3,4] This integration of neuroanatomical expertise and computational power promises to transform diagnostic paradigms, offering personalized treatment strategies grounded in real-time imaging analytics. Anatomical Basis of Cerebral Stroke Vascular architecture and vulnerability The cerebral vasculature’s complex anatomy determines both stroke susceptibility and clinical presentation. The brain receives blood supply through two main systems: the anterior circulation (carotid arteries) supplying approximately 80% of cerebral tissue and the posterior circulation (vertebrobasilar system) serving the brainstem, cerebellum, and posterior cerebral regions.[3] This anatomical arrangement creates distinct vulnerability patterns, with middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory strokes being the most common due to the vessel’s direct continuation from the internal carotid artery and its extensive cortical distribution. Types of Stroke and Their Anatomical Impact The cerebral strokes are broadly classified into two types. Ischemic stroke (85% of cases) The various causes of ischemic stroke are: Thrombotic stroke: Caused by blood clot (thrombus) and occurs in large vessels (carotid, MCA). It creates well-demarcated infarct zones in the areas supplied by these vessels affecting cortical and subcortical structures Embolic stroke: Occurs when a blood clot formed elsewhere in the body travels through the bloodstream to lodge elsewhere in a blood vessel of brain. Typically affects cortical areas first, creating wedge-shaped infarcts pointing toward the ventricles. Multiple small infarcts may occur simultaneously Lacunar stroke: A type of ischemic stroke which affects small penetrating arteries (100–400 micrometers), creating small, deep infarcts in basal ganglia, thalamus, brainstem. This type of stroke is anatomically distinct from cortical strokes. It occurs due to hyperfusion as in shock and cerebral venous thrombosis. Hemorrhagic stroke (15% of cases) The various causes of hemorrhagic stroke are: Intracerebral hemorrhage: Occurs due to rupture of blood vessel inside the brain, following head trauma, high blood pressure, etc. It is most common in basal ganglia, thalamus, brainstem, and cerebellum, creating a mass effect with displacement of surrounding structures Subarachnoid hemorrhage: Occurs due to bleeding in subarachnoid space, due to rupture of aneurysms. Here, blood accumulates in cerebrospinal fluid spaces around the brain surface, causing vasospasm affecting multiple vascular territories and may lead to secondary ischemic changes. The circle of Willis provides crucial collateral circulation during vascular compromise. However, anatomical variants occur in up to 50% of individuals, significantly affecting stroke risk and severity.[4] Understanding these variations is essential for predicting clinical outcomes and planning therapeutic interventions. Cellular and tissue-level changes Stroke involves complex cellular changes triggered by cerebral hypoperfusion. The ischemic core, where blood flow drops below 10–12 mL/100 g/min, undergoes irreversible neuronal death within minutes through energy failure and excitotoxicity. Surrounding this core lies the ischemic penumbra, a region of reduced perfusion (12–20 mL/100g/min) where neurons remain viable but functionally impaired.[5] This penumbral tissue represents the therapeutic target for acute interventions, as its salvage can significantly improve clinical outcomes. The anatomical distribution of gray and white matter creates differential vulnerability patterns. Gray matter, with its high metabolic demands and dense neuronal populations, shows earlier ischemic changes. White matter, consisting primarily of myelinated axons, demonstrates a greater resistance to hypoxia but suffers delayed deterioration through Wallerian degeneration when disconnected from neuronal cell bodies. Regional anatomical correlations Different brain regions exhibit varying susceptibility to ischemic injury based on their vascular supply and metabolic demands. The hippocampus, with its high energy requirements and end-arterial blood supply, shows vulnerability, explaining the memory deficits often observed in posterior circulation strokes. Similarly, the watershed zones between major arterial territories become critically important during systemic hypotension, creating characteristic bilateral cortical or subcortical infarction patterns. The basal ganglia and thalamus, supplied by small perforating arteries, are common sites for lacunar strokes. These regions’ compact fiber arrangement means that small lesions can produce disproportionately severe clinical deficits, particularly affecting motor and sensory pathways coursing through the internal capsule. Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Stroke Detection: Anatomical Foundations Imaging-based pattern recognition AI’s application in stroke detection leverages the technology’s superior pattern recognition capabilities to identify subtle anatomical changes that may escape human observation. Modern AI algorithms analyze multiple imaging parameters simultaneously, including tissue density variations, perfusion patterns, and structural deformations that reflect underlying anatomical pathology.[6] In computed tomography (CT) imaging, AI systems detect early ischemic changes by recognizing loss of gray–white matter differentiation, subtle hypodensity, and the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score regions. These anatomical markers, often imperceptible in the crucial 1st hours after symptom onset, become identifiable through AI’s ability to process subtle Hounsfield unit variations across 1000 of pixels simultaneously. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging provides a richer anatomical information for AI analysis. Diffusion-weighted imaging reveals cellular-level changes through restricted water movement in ischemic tissue, while perfusion studies demonstrate hemodynamic alterations in anatomically defined vascular territories. AI algorithms ability to integrate these multimodal datasets to create comprehensive anatomical maps of stroke pathology.[7] Vascular territory analysis One of the AI’s most significant contributions lies in automated vascular territory analysis. Traditional stroke assessment relies on clinicians’ ability to correlate clinical findings with anatomical knowledge of cerebral vascular territories. AI systems can instantaneously map infarct locations to specific arterial distributions, predict clinical deficits based on anatomical involvement, and estimate tissue at risk in real time.[8] This anatomical precision enables more targeted therapeutic decisions. For instance, AI can differentiate between strokes affecting eloquent cortical areas versus those limited to subcortical white matter, informing decisions about aggressive interventional approaches versus conservative management. Collateral circulation assessment AI’s ability to analyze complex vascular anatomy extends to collateral circulation assessment, a critical factor in stroke outcomes. By analyzing CT angiography or MR perfusion data, AI algorithms can quantify collateral flow patterns, predict penumbral viability, and estimate the time window for successful intervention.[9] This anatomically based assessment moves beyond simple time-based treatment protocols toward personalized medicine approaches. Clinical Implications and Future Directions Enhanced diagnostic accuracy AI’s integration into stroke care has demonstrated remarkable improvements in diagnostic accuracy. Studies show that AI systems can detect large vessel occlusions with sensitivity and specificity exceeding 90%, often identifying strokes missed by initial clinical assessment.[10] This enhanced detection capability, grounded in sophisticated anatomical analysis, translates directly into improved patient outcomes through earlier intervention. The technology’s ability to process imaging data within minutes of acquisition enables real-time decision support, particularly valuable in emergency settings where rapid triage is essential. AI systems can automatically alert stroke teams, predict clinical severity based on anatomical involvement, and recommend appropriate treatment pathways. Personalized treatment approaches Understanding individual anatomical variations through AI analysis enables increasingly personalized treatment strategies. Rather than applying uniform protocols, clinicians can tailor interventions based on specific anatomical findings, collateral circulation patterns, and predicted tissue outcomes. This precision medicine approach represents a fundamental shift from time-based treatment windows toward biology-based decision-making. Challenges and limitations Despite significant advances, AI implementation in stroke care faces several challenges. Algorithm training requires vast, diverse datasets representing various anatomical variants and pathological presentations. Ensuring AI systems perform reliably across different populations, imaging protocols, and clinical settings remains an ongoing challenge requiring continuous validation and refinement. However, overreliance on AI risks the diagnostic complacency, a challenge addressed through hybrid human-AI workflows that prioritize clinician oversight in complex cases.[2] Conclusion The intersection of anatomical understanding and AI represents a transformative approach to cerebral stroke detection and management. By leveraging detailed knowledge of cerebrovascular anatomy, AI systems can identify subtle pathological changes, predict clinical outcomes, and guide therapeutic decisions with unprecedented precision. As these technologies continue to evolve, they promise to enhance the speed and accuracy of stroke diagnosis, ultimately improving outcomes for millions of patients worldwide. The future of stroke care lies in this synergistic combination of anatomical expertise and computational power, offering hope for more effective treatments and better patient outcomes.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,691
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,349

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,285
Écart entre enseignants0,271 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Anatomical Society of IndiaMême sujetAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementTravaux en français237 207