MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411921002 · doi:10.4103/jasi.jasi_102_25

The Anatomical Basis of Cerebral Stroke: Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Detection and Diagnosis

2025· article· en· W4411921002 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vishram Singh, Krishna Chaitanya Reddy, Rashi Singh, Gaurav Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Anatomical Society of India · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasis (linear algebra)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceStroke (engine)MedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationNeurosciencePsychologyEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction A stroke, also known as a cerebral stroke, is a medical condition in which blood supply to the brain is interrupted or blocked, leading to its cell death. This can lead to long-term disabilities and even death. Cerebral stroke remains a leading cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide, affecting approximately 15 million people annually and representing a critical public health challenge.[1] Immediate intervention is critical, as delays in treatment exacerbate neuronal loss and worsen clinical outcomes.[2] Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have revolutionized stroke care by enabling rapid, precise anatomical analysis of cerebrovascular pathology, from vascular occlusion patterns to penumbral viability.[3,4] This integration of neuroanatomical expertise and computational power promises to transform diagnostic paradigms, offering personalized treatment strategies grounded in real-time imaging analytics. Anatomical Basis of Cerebral Stroke Vascular architecture and vulnerability The cerebral vasculature’s complex anatomy determines both stroke susceptibility and clinical presentation. The brain receives blood supply through two main systems: the anterior circulation (carotid arteries) supplying approximately 80% of cerebral tissue and the posterior circulation (vertebrobasilar system) serving the brainstem, cerebellum, and posterior cerebral regions.[3] This anatomical arrangement creates distinct vulnerability patterns, with middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory strokes being the most common due to the vessel’s direct continuation from the internal carotid artery and its extensive cortical distribution. Types of Stroke and Their Anatomical Impact The cerebral strokes are broadly classified into two types. Ischemic stroke (85% of cases) The various causes of ischemic stroke are: Thrombotic stroke: Caused by blood clot (thrombus) and occurs in large vessels (carotid, MCA). It creates well-demarcated infarct zones in the areas supplied by these vessels affecting cortical and subcortical structures Embolic stroke: Occurs when a blood clot formed elsewhere in the body travels through the bloodstream to lodge elsewhere in a blood vessel of brain. Typically affects cortical areas first, creating wedge-shaped infarcts pointing toward the ventricles. Multiple small infarcts may occur simultaneously Lacunar stroke: A type of ischemic stroke which affects small penetrating arteries (100–400 micrometers), creating small, deep infarcts in basal ganglia, thalamus, brainstem. This type of stroke is anatomically distinct from cortical strokes. It occurs due to hyperfusion as in shock and cerebral venous thrombosis. Hemorrhagic stroke (15% of cases) The various causes of hemorrhagic stroke are: Intracerebral hemorrhage: Occurs due to rupture of blood vessel inside the brain, following head trauma, high blood pressure, etc. It is most common in basal ganglia, thalamus, brainstem, and cerebellum, creating a mass effect with displacement of surrounding structures Subarachnoid hemorrhage: Occurs due to bleeding in subarachnoid space, due to rupture of aneurysms. Here, blood accumulates in cerebrospinal fluid spaces around the brain surface, causing vasospasm affecting multiple vascular territories and may lead to secondary ischemic changes. The circle of Willis provides crucial collateral circulation during vascular compromise. However, anatomical variants occur in up to 50% of individuals, significantly affecting stroke risk and severity.[4] Understanding these variations is essential for predicting clinical outcomes and planning therapeutic interventions. Cellular and tissue-level changes Stroke involves complex cellular changes triggered by cerebral hypoperfusion. The ischemic core, where blood flow drops below 10–12 mL/100 g/min, undergoes irreversible neuronal death within minutes through energy failure and excitotoxicity. Surrounding this core lies the ischemic penumbra, a region of reduced perfusion (12–20 mL/100g/min) where neurons remain viable but functionally impaired.[5] This penumbral tissue represents the therapeutic target for acute interventions, as its salvage can significantly improve clinical outcomes. The anatomical distribution of gray and white matter creates differential vulnerability patterns. Gray matter, with its high metabolic demands and dense neuronal populations, shows earlier ischemic changes. White matter, consisting primarily of myelinated axons, demonstrates a greater resistance to hypoxia but suffers delayed deterioration through Wallerian degeneration when disconnected from neuronal cell bodies. Regional anatomical correlations Different brain regions exhibit varying susceptibility to ischemic injury based on their vascular supply and metabolic demands. The hippocampus, with its high energy requirements and end-arterial blood supply, shows vulnerability, explaining the memory deficits often observed in posterior circulation strokes. Similarly, the watershed zones between major arterial territories become critically important during systemic hypotension, creating characteristic bilateral cortical or subcortical infarction patterns. The basal ganglia and thalamus, supplied by small perforating arteries, are common sites for lacunar strokes. These regions’ compact fiber arrangement means that small lesions can produce disproportionately severe clinical deficits, particularly affecting motor and sensory pathways coursing through the internal capsule. Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Stroke Detection: Anatomical Foundations Imaging-based pattern recognition AI’s application in stroke detection leverages the technology’s superior pattern recognition capabilities to identify subtle anatomical changes that may escape human observation. Modern AI algorithms analyze multiple imaging parameters simultaneously, including tissue density variations, perfusion patterns, and structural deformations that reflect underlying anatomical pathology.[6] In computed tomography (CT) imaging, AI systems detect early ischemic changes by recognizing loss of gray–white matter differentiation, subtle hypodensity, and the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score regions. These anatomical markers, often imperceptible in the crucial 1st hours after symptom onset, become identifiable through AI’s ability to process subtle Hounsfield unit variations across 1000 of pixels simultaneously. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging provides a richer anatomical information for AI analysis. Diffusion-weighted imaging reveals cellular-level changes through restricted water movement in ischemic tissue, while perfusion studies demonstrate hemodynamic alterations in anatomically defined vascular territories. AI algorithms ability to integrate these multimodal datasets to create comprehensive anatomical maps of stroke pathology.[7] Vascular territory analysis One of the AI’s most significant contributions lies in automated vascular territory analysis. Traditional stroke assessment relies on clinicians’ ability to correlate clinical findings with anatomical knowledge of cerebral vascular territories. AI systems can instantaneously map infarct locations to specific arterial distributions, predict clinical deficits based on anatomical involvement, and estimate tissue at risk in real time.[8] This anatomical precision enables more targeted therapeutic decisions. For instance, AI can differentiate between strokes affecting eloquent cortical areas versus those limited to subcortical white matter, informing decisions about aggressive interventional approaches versus conservative management. Collateral circulation assessment AI’s ability to analyze complex vascular anatomy extends to collateral circulation assessment, a critical factor in stroke outcomes. By analyzing CT angiography or MR perfusion data, AI algorithms can quantify collateral flow patterns, predict penumbral viability, and estimate the time window for successful intervention.[9] This anatomically based assessment moves beyond simple time-based treatment protocols toward personalized medicine approaches. Clinical Implications and Future Directions Enhanced diagnostic accuracy AI’s integration into stroke care has demonstrated remarkable improvements in diagnostic accuracy. Studies show that AI systems can detect large vessel occlusions with sensitivity and specificity exceeding 90%, often identifying strokes missed by initial clinical assessment.[10] This enhanced detection capability, grounded in sophisticated anatomical analysis, translates directly into improved patient outcomes through earlier intervention. The technology’s ability to process imaging data within minutes of acquisition enables real-time decision support, particularly valuable in emergency settings where rapid triage is essential. AI systems can automatically alert stroke teams, predict clinical severity based on anatomical involvement, and recommend appropriate treatment pathways. Personalized treatment approaches Understanding individual anatomical variations through AI analysis enables increasingly personalized treatment strategies. Rather than applying uniform protocols, clinicians can tailor interventions based on specific anatomical findings, collateral circulation patterns, and predicted tissue outcomes. This precision medicine approach represents a fundamental shift from time-based treatment windows toward biology-based decision-making. Challenges and limitations Despite significant advances, AI implementation in stroke care faces several challenges. Algorithm training requires vast, diverse datasets representing various anatomical variants and pathological presentations. Ensuring AI systems perform reliably across different populations, imaging protocols, and clinical settings remains an ongoing challenge requiring continuous validation and refinement. However, overreliance on AI risks the diagnostic complacency, a challenge addressed through hybrid human-AI workflows that prioritize clinician oversight in complex cases.[2] Conclusion The intersection of anatomical understanding and AI represents a transformative approach to cerebral stroke detection and management. By leveraging detailed knowledge of cerebrovascular anatomy, AI systems can identify subtle pathological changes, predict clinical outcomes, and guide therapeutic decisions with unprecedented precision. As these technologies continue to evolve, they promise to enhance the speed and accuracy of stroke diagnosis, ultimately improving outcomes for millions of patients worldwide. The future of stroke care lies in this synergistic combination of anatomical expertise and computational power, offering hope for more effective treatments and better patient outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Anatomical Society of IndiaSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207