Effectiveness of introducing pulse oximetry and clinical decision support algorithms for the management of sick children in primary care in India and Tanzania on hospitalisation and mortality: the TIMCI pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Pulse oximetry can support better detection of hypoxaemia, an important mortality predictor, and digital clinical decision support algorithms (CDSAs) can strengthen adherence to Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) guidelines. This study sought to address evidence gaps on the impact of providing these tools to primary care healthcare providers on under-five hospitalisations and mortality. Methods A pragmatic, parallel group, superiority, cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) conducted in 172 primary care facilities in India and Tanzania (106 and 66 facilities, respectively). Facilities were randomly allocated (1:1) in India to pulse oximetry (PO) or control and (1:1:1) in Tanzania to PO + CDSA, PO, or control, stratified by facility type and location (India: district; Tanzania: urban/rural). Sick children aged 0–59 months attending study facilities were eligible. Pulse oximeters and CDSAs were given to healthcare providers, along with training and guidance, supportive supervision, monitoring, community engagement, and operational support. Providers were advised to use pulse oximetry for all sick children in India, and in Tanzania for all 1–59 days, and for those 2–59 months with cough, difficulty breathing, or a moderate to severe illness. Urgent referral was recommended for SpO 2 <90%. Trained research assistants collected data from caregivers and facility records on Day 0, with a follow-up phone call or visit on Day 7 and 28. Two primary outcomes, based on caregiver report, were assessed centrally: 1) rates of ‘severe complication' (death, delayed hospitalisation (≥24 h from the Day 0 consultation) or hospitalisation without Day 0 referral) by Day 7; and 2) rates of hospitalisation within 24 h of the Day 0 consultation, with referral. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed on combined and individual country data, stratified by age (1–59 days, 2–59 months). Primary outcomes were assessed using generalised estimating equations for logistic regression, with facilities as clusters. Results were estimated in terms of odds ratios and risk differences (RDs), adjusted where computable. The trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04910750). Findings A total of 157,677 sick children (1–59 days: 3188 control, 4012 PO, 2386 PO + CDSA; 2–59 months: 54,318 control, 56,968 PO, 36,805 PO + CDSA) were enrolled from 28 March, 2022 to 31 March, 2023 in Tanzania and from 20 June, 2022 to 21 April, 2023 in India. Severe complications were rare in the control arm, with 16 (0·5%) events in 1–59 days, 77 (0·1%) in 2–59 months. No significant difference was observed in 1–59 days in the PO arm, with 27 events (0·7%, RD 0·2% [−0·2%; 0·5%]), but a slight increase was noted in 2–59 months, with 143 events (0·3%, adjusted RD 0·1% [0·0%; 0·2%]). No statistically significant differences were observed in the CDSA + PO arm, with 21 events (0·9%, RD 0·5% [−0·1%, 1·0%]) in 1–59 days, 128 (0·3%, adjusted RD 0·1% [−0·0%, 0·3%]) in 2–59 months. Day 0 hospitalisations with referral were very rare in the control arm, with 0 events (0·0%) in 1–59 days, 12 (0·0%) in 2–59 months. Arm comparisons were either not computable or not statistically significant, within the PO arm: 9 events (0·2%) in 1–59 days, 22 (0·0%, RD 0·0% [−0·0%, 0·1%]) in 2–59 months; in the CDSA + PO arm: 6 events (0·3%) in 1–59 days, 32 (0·1%, RD 0·0% [−0·0%, 0·1%]) in 2–59 months. Interpretation When implemented in routine health systems at primary care level in India and Tanzania, contrary to expectations, pulse oximetry and CDSAs were not found to increase rates of hospitalisation within 24 h of primary care referral, nor to decrease deaths, or delayed or un-referred hospitalisations. Wider health system challenges, including referral barriers, inequitable oxygen access and hospital care quality must be addressed if the potential of these tools in delivering child outcome benefits is to be realised. Funding Unitaid grant n°2019-35-TIMCI: Tools for Integrated Management of Childhood Illness.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».