MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411988609 · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103306

Effectiveness of introducing pulse oximetry and clinical decision support algorithms for the management of sick children in primary care in India and Tanzania on hospitalisation and mortality: the TIMCI pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial

2025· article· en· W4411988609 on OpenAlexaff
Fenella Beynon, Grace Mhalu, Divas Kumar, Silvia Cicconi, Hélène Langet, Gillian A. Levine, Girdhar G. Agarwal, Charles Festo, Tracy R. Glass, Gaurav Kumar, Samwel Lwambura, Lena Matata, Abdallah Mkopi, Robert Moshiro, Fabian Schaer, Leah F. Bohle, Mira Emmanuel-Fabula, Megan Horlacher, Susan Horton, John Maiba, Suzan Makawia, Naomi Masanja, Deusdedit Mjungu, Ibrahim Evans Mtebene, Olgah Odek, Vânia Oliveira Carvalho, Elena Pantjushenko, Elisabeth Reus, Michael Ruffo, Kovid Sharma, Helen L. Storey, Valérie D’Acremont, Honorati Masanja, Shally Awasthi, Kaspar Wyss

Bibliographic record

VenueEClinicalMedicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUnitaidUniversity of NairobiBotnar Research Centre for Child Health, University of BaselPATHPublic Health Institute
KeywordsMedicineTanzaniaPulse oximetryCluster (spacecraft)Primary careDecision support systemAlgorithmIntensive care medicineFamily medicineData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Pulse oximetry can support better detection of hypoxaemia, an important mortality predictor, and digital clinical decision support algorithms (CDSAs) can strengthen adherence to Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) guidelines. This study sought to address evidence gaps on the impact of providing these tools to primary care healthcare providers on under-five hospitalisations and mortality. Methods A pragmatic, parallel group, superiority, cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) conducted in 172 primary care facilities in India and Tanzania (106 and 66 facilities, respectively). Facilities were randomly allocated (1:1) in India to pulse oximetry (PO) or control and (1:1:1) in Tanzania to PO + CDSA, PO, or control, stratified by facility type and location (India: district; Tanzania: urban/rural). Sick children aged 0–59 months attending study facilities were eligible. Pulse oximeters and CDSAs were given to healthcare providers, along with training and guidance, supportive supervision, monitoring, community engagement, and operational support. Providers were advised to use pulse oximetry for all sick children in India, and in Tanzania for all 1–59 days, and for those 2–59 months with cough, difficulty breathing, or a moderate to severe illness. Urgent referral was recommended for SpO 2 <90%. Trained research assistants collected data from caregivers and facility records on Day 0, with a follow-up phone call or visit on Day 7 and 28. Two primary outcomes, based on caregiver report, were assessed centrally: 1) rates of ‘severe complication' (death, delayed hospitalisation (≥24 h from the Day 0 consultation) or hospitalisation without Day 0 referral) by Day 7; and 2) rates of hospitalisation within 24 h of the Day 0 consultation, with referral. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed on combined and individual country data, stratified by age (1–59 days, 2–59 months). Primary outcomes were assessed using generalised estimating equations for logistic regression, with facilities as clusters. Results were estimated in terms of odds ratios and risk differences (RDs), adjusted where computable. The trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04910750). Findings A total of 157,677 sick children (1–59 days: 3188 control, 4012 PO, 2386 PO + CDSA; 2–59 months: 54,318 control, 56,968 PO, 36,805 PO + CDSA) were enrolled from 28 March, 2022 to 31 March, 2023 in Tanzania and from 20 June, 2022 to 21 April, 2023 in India. Severe complications were rare in the control arm, with 16 (0·5%) events in 1–59 days, 77 (0·1%) in 2–59 months. No significant difference was observed in 1–59 days in the PO arm, with 27 events (0·7%, RD 0·2% [−0·2%; 0·5%]), but a slight increase was noted in 2–59 months, with 143 events (0·3%, adjusted RD 0·1% [0·0%; 0·2%]). No statistically significant differences were observed in the CDSA + PO arm, with 21 events (0·9%, RD 0·5% [−0·1%, 1·0%]) in 1–59 days, 128 (0·3%, adjusted RD 0·1% [−0·0%, 0·3%]) in 2–59 months. Day 0 hospitalisations with referral were very rare in the control arm, with 0 events (0·0%) in 1–59 days, 12 (0·0%) in 2–59 months. Arm comparisons were either not computable or not statistically significant, within the PO arm: 9 events (0·2%) in 1–59 days, 22 (0·0%, RD 0·0% [−0·0%, 0·1%]) in 2–59 months; in the CDSA + PO arm: 6 events (0·3%) in 1–59 days, 32 (0·1%, RD 0·0% [−0·0%, 0·1%]) in 2–59 months. Interpretation When implemented in routine health systems at primary care level in India and Tanzania, contrary to expectations, pulse oximetry and CDSAs were not found to increase rates of hospitalisation within 24 h of primary care referral, nor to decrease deaths, or delayed or un-referred hospitalisations. Wider health system challenges, including referral barriers, inequitable oxygen access and hospital care quality must be addressed if the potential of these tools in delivering child outcome benefits is to be realised. Funding Unitaid grant n°2019-35-TIMCI: Tools for Integrated Management of Childhood Illness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEClinicalMedicineSame topicNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringFrench-language works237,207