Abstract A011: Interpretable machine learning for discovery, evaluation and clinical translation of context-specific dependencies
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Functional genomics and compound screens across cancer cell line models have identified thousands of selective vulnerabilities, either gene dependencies or drug responses. Linking these vulnerabilities to genetic, epigenetic and molecular states that drive tumorigenesis is essential to develop them as therapeutic targets. While simple relationships are easily captured by binary or linear associations, such as a driver gene and its mutation or expression, complex or heterogenous relationships are more difficult to characterize. Machine learning approaches are commonly employed to associate vulnerabilities with molecular contexts; however, off-the-shelf models lack the comprehensive explainability required to effectively capture complex biological context. To address this shortcoming, we developed Oncoforest, a machine learning toolkit designed for biologically interpretable prediction of viability readouts and association with molecular context. Oncoforest implements forest-based model variants designed for explainability from large feature-sets, and builds biologically-informed attribution networks from model Shapley values. Using these models and networks, we successfully recapitulate the known molecular context of driver genes and propose hundreds of novel context-specific vulnerabilities. We further categorize these into types based on the context relationship, for example, self gain-of-function, paralog loss-of-function, or other synthetic or collateral lethality. In order to consider the therapeutic potential of gene expression-based molecular context, it is important to be able to evaluate their translation to patient tumors. To enable this, we have generated a harmonized transcriptomic map consisting of 1019 cancer cell lines, 14604 tumors (from TCGA and clinical trials), and 9635 normals. Applying the models to predict viability readouts within the tumor and normal bulk-tissue map, Oncoforest estimates cancer-vulnerability and normal-tissue sensitivity of selective gene dependencies and drug responses. For greater granularity, learned molecular signatures were applied to score 3146 single-cell types from a single-cell atlas. We demonstrate that these predictions are able to identify known tissue and cell-type sensitivities from therapeutic intervention, as well as to stratify patient outcomes, underscoring the clinical relevance of such approaches. Taken together, Oncoforest represents a set of machine learning tools for enhanced interpretability, suitable for discovery and assessment of cancer vulnerabilities. Citation Format: James Mondo, Michal Kabza, Julien Tremblay, Barzin Nabet, Marc Hafner, Xiaosai Yao, Timothy Sterne-Weiler. Interpretable machine learning for discovery, evaluation and clinical translation of context-specific dependencies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; 2025 Jul 10-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(13_Suppl):Abstract nr A011.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,019 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».