MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A011: Interpretable machine learning for discovery, evaluation and clinical translation of context-specific dependencies

2025· article· en· W4412163851 on OpenAlexaffabout
James A. Mondo, Michał Kabza, Julien Tremblay, Barzin Y. Nabet, Xiaosai Yao, Timothy Sterne-Weiler

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsInro Consultants (Canada)Roche (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Translation (biology)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceNatural language processingMachine learningMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Functional genomics and compound screens across cancer cell line models have identified thousands of selective vulnerabilities, either gene dependencies or drug responses. Linking these vulnerabilities to genetic, epigenetic and molecular states that drive tumorigenesis is essential to develop them as therapeutic targets. While simple relationships are easily captured by binary or linear associations, such as a driver gene and its mutation or expression, complex or heterogenous relationships are more difficult to characterize. Machine learning approaches are commonly employed to associate vulnerabilities with molecular contexts; however, off-the-shelf models lack the comprehensive explainability required to effectively capture complex biological context. To address this shortcoming, we developed Oncoforest, a machine learning toolkit designed for biologically interpretable prediction of viability readouts and association with molecular context. Oncoforest implements forest-based model variants designed for explainability from large feature-sets, and builds biologically-informed attribution networks from model Shapley values. Using these models and networks, we successfully recapitulate the known molecular context of driver genes and propose hundreds of novel context-specific vulnerabilities. We further categorize these into types based on the context relationship, for example, self gain-of-function, paralog loss-of-function, or other synthetic or collateral lethality. In order to consider the therapeutic potential of gene expression-based molecular context, it is important to be able to evaluate their translation to patient tumors. To enable this, we have generated a harmonized transcriptomic map consisting of 1019 cancer cell lines, 14604 tumors (from TCGA and clinical trials), and 9635 normals. Applying the models to predict viability readouts within the tumor and normal bulk-tissue map, Oncoforest estimates cancer-vulnerability and normal-tissue sensitivity of selective gene dependencies and drug responses. For greater granularity, learned molecular signatures were applied to score 3146 single-cell types from a single-cell atlas. We demonstrate that these predictions are able to identify known tissue and cell-type sensitivities from therapeutic intervention, as well as to stratify patient outcomes, underscoring the clinical relevance of such approaches. Taken together, Oncoforest represents a set of machine learning tools for enhanced interpretability, suitable for discovery and assessment of cancer vulnerabilities. Citation Format: James Mondo, Michal Kabza, Julien Tremblay, Barzin Nabet, Marc Hafner, Xiaosai Yao, Timothy Sterne-Weiler. Interpretable machine learning for discovery, evaluation and clinical translation of context-specific dependencies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; 2025 Jul 10-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(13_Suppl):Abstract nr A011.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score0.659

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.335
GPT teacher head0.576
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicMachine Learning in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207