Indigenous, integrative, and biomedical perimenopause and postmenopause healthcare for Indigenous midlife peoples residing in the United States and Canada: A scoping review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Little is known about the menopause-related healthcare of Indigenous people of the United States and Canada. This scoping review mapped the existing literature on Indigenous, integrative, and biomedical healthcare for U.S.- and Canada-based perimenopausal Indigenous populations. Methods We followed the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The protocol was registered on Open Science Framework. Eligibility criteria included records focused on Indigenous people of the U.S. and Canada perimenopause/postmenopause healthcare. Medline and eight other data bases were searched on June 1, 2023, and updated November 21, 2024. Covidence was used for selecting and extracting data. Findings After screening 6,684 records, 45 met inclusion criteria. These focused on Indigenous people’s experiences, care barriers, symptom reporting, and treatment preferences. Traditionality, community roles, and cultural beliefs influenced symptom experience and healthcare-seeking. Many participants preferred Indigenous or integrative interventions, sometimes in combination with biomedical care. Barriers included rushed encounters, language and cultural disconnects, and systemic inequities. Interpretation Findings highlight the need for culturally responsive, patient-centered care during the menopausal transition with an emphasis on evidence-based interventions including Indigenous and integrative health approaches. Additional research, stronger community engagement, and healthcare-provider training will help improve perimenopause health outcomes for Indigenous populations in the United States and Canada Funding The authors disclose receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The first author received support from the National Clinician Scholars Program (NCSP) as a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Pennsylvania. Additionally, she was supported by the National Institute of Nursing Research of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number F31NR020431. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the Indian Health Service. The authors were supported by a grant from the University of Utah office of the Vice President for Research. Panel: Research in Context Evidence before this study Before undertaking this scoping review, the review team identified several sentinel articles. No prior evidence reviews nor protocols on our topic were identified in searches conducted on February 22, 2023 in PROSPERO, Open Science Framework, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Campbell Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, and Sociological Abstracts. We then conducted comprehensive searches across nine databases—Medline (Ovid) 1946-2024, Embase (Elsevier) 1974-2024, CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost) 1937-2024, Ageline (EBSCOhost) 1966-2024, Alt HealthWatch (EBSCOhost) 1984-2024, APA PsycInfo (EBSCOhost) 1872-2024, Scopus (Elsevier) 1977-2024, Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate) 1900-2024, and the Native Health Database (1900-2024). Searches were initially conducted on June 1, 2023, and repeated on November 21, 2024. We also reviewed reference lists of included studies. Search strategies combined keywords and subject headings related to menopause, healthcare, and Indigenous populations. Only English-language records were included due to funding constraints. We excluded books and cancer-related studies to focus on natural or surgical menopause not induced by chemotherapy. No quality assessment of included studies was conducted in accordance with scoping-review methodology. Added value of this study This is the first known scoping review to synthesize literature on perimenopause and postmenopause healthcare among Indigenous peoples in the United States and Canada. It maps Indigenous, integrative, and biomedical treatment practices; highlights structural and cultural barriers to care; and identifies the influence of traditional knowledge, community roles, and colonization on symptom interpretation and treatment-seeking. It also summarizes patient-centered recommendations for improving perimenopause healthcare delivery, and outlines key research gaps. Implications of all the available evidence Findings from this review, combined with existing literature, emphasize the urgent need for culturally responsive, community-informed healthcare for Indigenous midlife populations. Interventions should consider traditional knowledge systems, language and literacy needs, and preferences for Indigenous and integrative treatments. Healthcare providers must engage in shared decision-making and address systemic barriers to care. Future research should center Indigenous perspectives, investigate disparities in symptom experiences, and help to improve access to perimenopause healthcare for Indigenous peoples.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,019 | 0,071 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,018 | 0,025 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».