Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Parents’ Satisfaction with Childhood Vaccine Services and Associated Factors in Ethiopia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Satisfaction with childhood vaccination services is a vital indication of care quality and it significantly influences healthcare outcomes. However, there is a paucity of comprehensive evidence on parents’ satisfaction with vaccination services. This review aimed to evaluate the level of satisfaction with childhood vaccination services and identify the determinants influencing this satisfaction among parents in Ethiopia. Methods Studies were systematically searched from April 3, 2024 to 30, 2024 using Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Science Direct, African Journal Online, and the Wiley Online Library. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality assessment tool designed for quality assessments was used to assess the scientific strength and the quality of each primary study. A random effects model was employed to calculate the pooled estimates. The Cochran’s Q test and I 2 statistic were used to assess the heterogeneity of studies. The symmetry of the funnel plot and Egger’s test were used to check for publication bias. Percentages and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to pool the effect measure. Results In this review, a total of 146,987 articles were retrieved. Ultimately, 13 studies involving 6,023 participants were included in the analysis. The level of parental satisfaction with childhood vaccination services was found to be 65.6% (95% CI: 58.74, 72.44%). Knowledge about vaccination services (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.09, 3.42), favorable attitudes toward vaccination (aOR = 3.23; 95% CI: 1.86, 5.62), welcoming approaches (aOR = 3.89; 95% CI: 1.80, 8.42), and waiting less than 30 minutes to receive services (aOR = 2.59; 95% CI: 1.25, 3.35) were the factors which contributed significantly to parental satisfaction with childhood vaccination services. Conclusions Overall, only two-thirds of parents were satisfied with the childhood vaccination services. Key factors of the level of satisfaction included healthcare providers’ greeting or welcoming approach, waiting times of less than 30 minutes at health facilities, knowledge, as well as their attitudes. To improve parental satisfaction in Ethiopia and similar contexts, it is crucial to address these risk factors. Policymakers should establish guidelines for compassionate and respectful care provision and develop strategies to implement patient-centered care services. Furthermore, it is recommended to improve timely and welcoming approaches to healthcare service delivery. Finally, enhancing parental satisfaction with healthcare services requires a multifaceted approach that prioritizes respectful interactions and efficient service delivery. Systematic Review Registration: (PROSPERO ID CRD42024577054)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,019 | 0,046 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,014 | 0,027 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,009 | 0,009 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».