MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412368951 · doi:10.1177/0974150x251336585

Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Parents’ Satisfaction with Childhood Vaccine Services and Associated Factors in Ethiopia

2025· article· en· W4412368951 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Agerie Mengistie Zeleke, Moges Tadesse Abebe, Getnet Azanaw Takele, Yosef Aragaw Gonete, Worku Chekol Tassew

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing & Midwifery Research Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFunnel plotOdds ratioScopusMedicineMeta-analysisPublication biasConfidence intervalVaccinationFamily medicineDemographyMEDLINEImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Satisfaction with childhood vaccination services is a vital indication of care quality and it significantly influences healthcare outcomes. However, there is a paucity of comprehensive evidence on parents’ satisfaction with vaccination services. This review aimed to evaluate the level of satisfaction with childhood vaccination services and identify the determinants influencing this satisfaction among parents in Ethiopia. Methods Studies were systematically searched from April 3, 2024 to 30, 2024 using Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Science Direct, African Journal Online, and the Wiley Online Library. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality assessment tool designed for quality assessments was used to assess the scientific strength and the quality of each primary study. A random effects model was employed to calculate the pooled estimates. The Cochran’s Q test and I 2 statistic were used to assess the heterogeneity of studies. The symmetry of the funnel plot and Egger’s test were used to check for publication bias. Percentages and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to pool the effect measure. Results In this review, a total of 146,987 articles were retrieved. Ultimately, 13 studies involving 6,023 participants were included in the analysis. The level of parental satisfaction with childhood vaccination services was found to be 65.6% (95% CI: 58.74, 72.44%). Knowledge about vaccination services (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.09, 3.42), favorable attitudes toward vaccination (aOR = 3.23; 95% CI: 1.86, 5.62), welcoming approaches (aOR = 3.89; 95% CI: 1.80, 8.42), and waiting less than 30 minutes to receive services (aOR = 2.59; 95% CI: 1.25, 3.35) were the factors which contributed significantly to parental satisfaction with childhood vaccination services. Conclusions Overall, only two-thirds of parents were satisfied with the childhood vaccination services. Key factors of the level of satisfaction included healthcare providers’ greeting or welcoming approach, waiting times of less than 30 minutes at health facilities, knowledge, as well as their attitudes. To improve parental satisfaction in Ethiopia and similar contexts, it is crucial to address these risk factors. Policymakers should establish guidelines for compassionate and respectful care provision and develop strategies to implement patient-centered care services. Furthermore, it is recommended to improve timely and welcoming approaches to healthcare service delivery. Finally, enhancing parental satisfaction with healthcare services requires a multifaceted approach that prioritizes respectful interactions and efficient service delivery. Systematic Review Registration: (PROSPERO ID CRD42024577054)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.046
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.046
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0140.027
Bibliometrics0.0090.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing & Midwifery Research Journal→Same topicVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy→French-language works237,207→