MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4412510363 · doi:10.1149/ma2025-01174mtgabs

All-Solid-State Ceramic Batteries from Hydro-Québec: Methodology, Performances and Future Developments through Interfaces Engineering and Electrochemical Advanced Measurements

2025· article· en· W4412510363 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Benoît Fleutot, Emmanuelle Garitte, Fabien Nassoy, Lara Faour, Charlotte Mallet, Jean‐Christophe Daigle, Benjamin Cruel, Jean-François Filion, Isabelle Filteau, Amélie Forand, Marie-Claude Girard, K. Tremblay, Chisu Kim

Notice bibliographique

RevueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueAdvancements in Battery Materials
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCeramicElectrochemistrySolid-stateMaterials scienceEngineering physicsEnvironmental scienceElectrical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringNanotechnologyMechanical engineeringChemistryMetallurgyPhysical chemistryElectrode

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Despite some progress performed, state-of-the-art lithium ion batteries still require improvements in energy and power to extend the range of electric vehicles and reduce charging time. In this domain, all-solid-state batteries are viable alternatives to conventional batteries employing organic electrolytes because of their benefits, i.e., high power density, high energy density, long-life operation and safety. These advantages stem from the great features of inorganic solid electrolytes, which are single ion conductor, so a high lithium ion transport number, and no-liquid nature. In particular, the sulfide-based solid electrolytes possess favorable mechanical properties, high ionic conductivity allowing improved all-solid-state batteries performances at room temperature but suffer of moisture exposure that could induce H2S generation. Sulfide-based solid-electrolytes can potentially be employed in conjunction with a lithium metal negative electrode and 5V-class high voltage positive electrode material. Indeed, lithium metal is believed to be the most promising negative electrode due to its specific large capacity (3862 mAh.g-1) and the lowest electrochemical potential (-3.03V vs ENH). Ceramic solid electrolytes and especially sulfide composite solid electrolyte have been considered to be the ideal solution to prevent dendrite growth because of their high shear modulus and high lithium transference number. At the same time, the chemical nature and composition of ceramic solid electrolyte can affect the dendrite growth by the interfacial chemical and electrochemical stability with lithium metal. In parallel, the sulfide solid electrolyte reacts with all components constituting the positive electrode as active material, electronic conductor, binder, current collector... Hence, all interfaces can generate side reaction, increase of polarisation, and so rapid battery fading. As demonstrated in literature, an important average pressure increase during cycling and aging can’t allow a future commercialisation of this technology. The safety is a crucial point and the generation of H2S in the case of all-solid-state battery based on sulfide electrolyte during scale-up phase and operation must be take into account and evaluated specifically. In this field and since a few years, Hydro-Quebec has decided to conduct specific research on all-solid ceramic batteries and especially in the field of sulfide-based ceramic electrolytes. Based on Hydro-Québec's knowledge with polymers, a solution of all-solid composite battery with ceramic tendency has been developed by generating several industrial properties at the different levels of the battery. The interaction previously observed in positive electrode mixture without binder have been resolved and integrated in slurry. In parallel, the impact between solid electrolyte ceramic film composition, density, reactivity with lithium metal and flexibility were studied to offer high conductivity and easily manipulation. Unlike the general perception that the sulfide electrolyte is not compatible with lithium metal, we successfully stabilized the lithium metal interface reaching the cycle life more than 700 cycles under industry-relevant pressure conditions at moderate temperature under pouch-cell configuration. The constraints of the use of li-ion equipment’s, cost reduction and safety have been considered at each level with quantitative measurements. Different parameters can influence the performances and aging of all solid state ceramic battery. To explore them, various electrochemical technics and associated specific treatments can be developed to extract and identify each phenomenon and ensure the better development of this technology. A specific sequential methodology will be presented with different examples from the materials, interfaces with lithium metal, pseudo-composites and temperature effects up to aging of total all-solid–state ceramic battery based on sulfide technology. The different improvements in positive composite electrode, in solid electrolyte ceramic film and in lithium metal interfaces will be explained. The presentation will show how technical and economical issues of sulfide electrolyte can be addressed to bring the technology closer to the market

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,534
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,938

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,276
Écart entre enseignants0,252 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueECS Meeting Abstracts→Même sujetAdvancements in Battery Materials→Travaux en français237 207→